From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: next iptables release Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:55:54 +0100 Message-ID: <49C240DA.2070006@trash.net> References: <49C202EA.40006@trash.net> <49C23FD6.6010503@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:34781 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752906AbZCSMz6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:55:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49C23FD6.6010503@netfilter.org> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > Patrick McHardy wrote: >> I've planned to release the next iptables version sometime (late) >> this weekend. We've had quite a lot of changes since the last >> version, please test the latest version from git and report any >> issues. >> >> Thanks! > > Great :). BTW, I'm finishing the cluster match manpage, I'll be done > tonight, I'd like to see it in this iptables release (even if the > feature is expected to appear in 2.6.30). I have to ask .. why? :) Besides potentially confusing people (why doesn't it work despite me doing everything the manpage says), what are the advantages of including the manpage before the actual implementation?