Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Eric Leblond <eric@inl.fr>
Cc: Kuzin Andrey <kuzinandrey@yandex.ru>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: drop packet without verdict from nfqueue after timeout
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:15:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C809ED.8070308@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1237845953.4786.47.camel@ice-age>

Eric Leblond wrote:
>> There's a very easy and cheap way to handle this. The packets have
>> sequence numbers and userspace should issues verdicts in ascending
>> order anyways to avoid reordering. Just add something that will drop
>> everything in the queue up to the sequence number contained in the
>> netlink message.
>>     
>
> I don't think the described mechanism is generic enough to be a default
> behaviour. It should be useful for projects like snort-inline but it
> will really a problem for software like NuFW which are asynchronous by
> design.
>
> In NuFW, packet authentication is triggered by a user message (signing
> of packet is done is userspace). Thus the ordering of the answer depends
> of the ordering of user messages. As NuFW authenticate packet at network
> scale (there is thus plenty of users), it is not possible to assume that
> the answer will be ordered.
>
> Thus, even if it could be useful, this mechanism should only be
> activated by an explicit userspace query. 

Good point. The in-sequence handling is also only necessary per flow,
so this definitely would need to be enabled explicitly.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-23 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-23 18:48 [PATCH]: drop packet without verdict from nfqueue after timeout Kuzin Andrey
2009-03-23 19:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-23 22:05   ` Eric Leblond
2009-03-23 22:15     ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-03-24  5:23       ` Re[2]: " Kuzin Andrey
2009-03-24  3:17     ` Kuzin Andrey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49C809ED.8070308@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=eric@inl.fr \
    --cc=kuzinandrey@yandex.ru \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox