From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] conntrack: ecache: move event cache to conntrack extension infrastructure
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:52:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49CCA1DA.7060902@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090327094009.8259.64117.stgit@Decadence>
Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> This patch reworks the event caching infrastructure to use the
> conntrack extension infrastructure. As a result, you can enable and
> disable event delivery via /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_events
> in runtime opposed to compilation time. The main drawback is that
> we consume more memory per conntrack if event delivery is enabled.
> static inline void
> nf_conntrack_event_cache(enum ip_conntrack_events event, struct nf_conn *ct)
> {
> - struct net *net = nf_ct_net(ct);
> - struct nf_conntrack_ecache *ecache;
> -
> - local_bh_disable();
> - ecache = per_cpu_ptr(net->ct.ecache, raw_smp_processor_id());
> - if (ct != ecache->ct)
> - __nf_ct_event_cache_init(ct);
> - ecache->events |= event;
> - local_bh_enable();
> + spin_lock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
> + __nf_conntrack_event_cache(event, ct);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
This defeats all the work we've been doing to make conntrack lockless.
This needs to be done differenty.
Generally, I'd say a better approach is to get rid of the notifier
chain (unnecessary overhead for the single user we have), replace it
by a function pointer for event delivery and use that as an indication
that events should be tracked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-27 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 9:38 [PATCH 0/5] improve ctnetlink event reliability Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 9:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] netfilter: conntrack: remove events flags from userspace exposed file Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 9:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] netfilter: conntrack: use nf_ct_kill() to destroy conntracks Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 9:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] netfilter: conntrack: don't report events on module removal Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 9:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] conntrack: ecache: move event cache to conntrack extension infrastructure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 9:52 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-03-27 11:37 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 11:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-27 11:57 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 11:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-27 9:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] ctnetlink: optional reliable event delivery Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 10:12 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-27 12:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 12:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-30 11:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49CCA1DA.7060902@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).