From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:00:54 +0200 Message-ID: <49D0B476.2000607@trash.net> References: <20090329064704.GA7255@localhost> <20090328.234739.26481917.davem@davemloft.net> <49CF62A2.6050803@netfilter.org> <20090329.134614.198823811.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, gorcunov@gmail.com, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090329.134614.198823811.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: Pablo Neira Ayuso > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:59:30 +0200 > >> David Miller wrote: >>> From: Cyrill Gorcunov >>> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:47:04 +0400 >>> >>>> [Randy Dunlap - Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 09:26:42PM -0700] >>>> ... >>>> | works_for_me. Thanks. >>>> | but missing S-O-B. >>>> | >>>> | Acked-by: Randy Dunlap >>>> ... >>>> >>>> Thanks for testing Randy. So if nobody will complain >>>> here is a solid version of the patch. Though I would like >>>> if Pablo or Patrick confirm its correctness. Thanks! >>> I'll apply this once Patrick or Pablo have a look at it. >> I think that the patch attached is better since it removes the overhead >> of the IPv6 dependency, which is indeed too much for the use of one >> function. Thanks. > > I think it's a lot better too, applied, thanks! No objections from my side, thanks :)