From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart De Schuymer Subject: Re: Compiling ebtables statically or dynamically results in different behaviour Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:43:03 +0200 Message-ID: <49ECB427.7030303@pandora.be> References: <2a7fce340904080257r4164cd63hcd5f07b036489aae@mail.gmail.com> <2a7fce340904200227j42e07fd3gbf507539809a4e08@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Tim Verhoeven Return-path: Received: from juliette.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.74]:39371 "EHLO juliette.telenet-ops.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750966AbZDTRnP (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:43:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2a7fce340904200227j42e07fd3gbf507539809a4e08@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, I'm currently lacking the time, but if you have some programming experience, a dump of the data sent to the kernel for the static and dynamic version of the code would be great. See ebt_deliver_table() in communication.c: the data pointed to by repl and repl->entries specifically. Please use a simple table: start with an empty one before issuing the command. cheers, Bart Tim Verhoeven schreef: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Tim Verhoeven > wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:49 AM, bdschuym@pandora.be >> wrote: >> >>> What is your exact command and what type of processor are you using? >>> >>> >> The command run is "ebtables -N 1000" >> >> This is /proc/cpuinfo : >> processor : 0 >> vendor_id : GenuineIntel >> cpu family : 6 >> model : 23 >> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz >> > ...snip... > > Hi again, > > Is there any update about this issue ? Can I do anything to help debug > the problem ? I have test machines available. > > Thanks, > Tim > >