From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Eric Leblond <eric@inl.fr>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] make thread-safe iface resolution in libnfnetlink
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 15:23:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A003DD2.7000905@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49F798EB.3050203@netfilter.org>
Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Eric Leblond wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've encountered some problems with libnfnetlink iface resolution on a
>> system where some interfaces are getting up and down: NuFW which uses
>> this feature has crashed during a down/up of an interfaces. One of
>> the reason seems that nufw uses one thread is used for iface related
>> event treatment and another thread is doing iface name resolution.
>>
>> As the hash can be modified or read without any lock, I think the
>> problem can be linked with this issue. I thus propose a patch that
>> modifies the iface resolution subsystem to make it thread-safe.
>
> Better do the locking in your application. You can define the lock in
> NuFW and protect the calls to libnfnetlink's interface API. Adding this
> locking to a library does not seem to me like the right thing, see that
> other non-threaded clients will have to live with the overhead of this
> lock that is completely useless for them. Of course, we can document
> that the interface API is not thread-safe.
I agree, it should be a user decision whether to use this.
Of course they need the information which callbacks need
protection.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-05 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 21:45 [RFC] make thread-safe iface resolution in libnfnetlink Eric Leblond
2009-04-28 21:45 ` [PATCH] iftable: make library thread-safe Eric Leblond
2009-04-29 0:01 ` [RFC] make thread-safe iface resolution in libnfnetlink Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-05-05 13:23 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A003DD2.7000905@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=eric@inl.fr \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).