From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: iptables Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 15:38:08 +0200 Message-ID: <4A004140.30805@trash.net> References: <49F56742.7080309@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Manu , Netfilter Developer Mailing List To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:41883 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751539AbZEENiJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2009 09:38:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Monday 2009-04-27 10:05, Manu wrote: >> #iptables -nvL -t mangle >> >> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) >> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination >> insmod: ip_tables.ko: no module by that name found >> modprobe: failed to load module ip_tables >> insmod: ip_tables.ko: no module by that name found >> modprobe: failed to load module ip_tables >> insmod: ip_tables.ko: no module by that name found >> modprobe: failed to load module ip_tables >> insmod: ip_tables.ko: no module by that name found >> modprobe: failed to load module ip_tables >> 0 0 MARK all -- * * 10.0.20.2 0.0.0.0/0 >> MARK set 0x14 >> >> >> My kernel is built with every point of iptables stuff included, not as module. > > I cannot reproduce this :/ Well, the message obviously originates from modprobe. So it seems to ignore the "-q" option set by iptables. Manu, please provide a strace -f of the iptables execution and your module-init-tools version.