netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support
@ 2009-05-31 14:28 Jozsef Kadlecsik
  2009-05-31 14:33 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
  2009-06-02 11:32 ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jozsef Kadlecsik @ 2009-05-31 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter-devel; +Cc: Patrick McHardy, Saatvik Agarwal

Hi Patrick,

The patch below adds supporting TCP simultaneous open to conntrack. The 
unused LISTEN state is replaced by a new state (SYN_SENT2) denoting the 
second SYN sent from the reply direction in the new case. The state table 
is updated and the function tcp_in_window is modified to handle 
simultaneous open.

The functionality can fairly easily be tested by socat. A sample tcpdump 
recording 

23:21:34.244733 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 49224, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 
TCP (6), length 60) 192.168.0.254.2020 > 192.168.0.1.2020: S, cksum 0xe75f 
(correct), 3383710133:3383710133(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 
173445629 0,nop,wscale 7>
23:21:34.244783 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP 
(6), length 40) 192.168.0.1.2020 > 192.168.0.254.2020: R, cksum 0x0253 
(correct), 0:0(0) ack 3383710134 win 0
23:21:36.038680 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 28092, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 
TCP (6), length 60) 192.168.0.1.2020 > 192.168.0.254.2020: S, cksum 0x704b 
(correct), 2634546729:2634546729(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 
824213 0,nop,wscale 1>
23:21:36.038777 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 49225, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 
TCP (6), length 60) 192.168.0.254.2020 > 192.168.0.1.2020: S, cksum 0xb179 
(correct), 3383710133:3383710133(0) ack 2634546730 win 5840 <mss 
1460,sackOK,timestamp 173447423 824213,nop,wscale 7>
23:21:36.038847 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 28093, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 
TCP (6), length 52) 192.168.0.1.2020 > 192.168.0.254.2020: ., cksum 0xebad 
(correct), ack 3383710134 win 2920 <nop,nop,timestamp 824213 173447423>

and the corresponding netlink events:

    [NEW] tcp      6 120 SYN_SENT src=192.168.0.254 dst=192.168.0.1 sport=2020 dport=2020 [UNREPLIED] src=192.168.0.1 dst=192.168.0.254 sport=2020 dport=2020
 [UPDATE] tcp      6 120 LISTEN src=192.168.0.254 dst=192.168.0.1 sport=2020 dport=2020 src=192.168.0.1 dst=192.168.0.254 sport=2020 dport=2020
 [UPDATE] tcp      6 60 SYN_RECV src=192.168.0.254 dst=192.168.0.1 sport=2020 dport=2020 src=192.168.0.1 dst=192.168.0.254 sport=2020 dport=2020
 [UPDATE] tcp      6 432000 ESTABLISHED src=192.168.0.254 dst=192.168.0.1 sport=2020 dport=2020 src=192.168.0.1 dst=192.168.0.254 sport=2020 dport=2020 [ASSURED]

The RST packet was dropped in the raw table, thus it did not reach 
conntrack.  nfnetlink_conntrack is unpatched so it shows the new SYN_SENT2 
state as the old unused LISTEN.

With TCP simultaneous open support we satisfy REQ-2 in RFC 5382 ;-).

Additional minor correction in this patch is that in order to catch
uninitialized reply directions, "td_maxwin == 0" is used instead of
"td_end == 0" because the former can't be true except in uninitialized
state while td_end may accidentally be equal to zero in the mid of a
connection.
---
 include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp.h |    2 +-
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c     |   97 +++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp.h b/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp.h
index b2f384d..05d17c7 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp.h
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ enum tcp_conntrack {
 	TCP_CONNTRACK_LAST_ACK,
 	TCP_CONNTRACK_TIME_WAIT,
 	TCP_CONNTRACK_CLOSE,
-	TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN,
+	TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT2,
 	TCP_CONNTRACK_MAX,
 	TCP_CONNTRACK_IGNORE
 };
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c
index 97a6e93..ba96d12 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static const char *const tcp_conntrack_names[] = {
 	"LAST_ACK",
 	"TIME_WAIT",
 	"CLOSE",
-	"LISTEN"
+	"SYN_SENT2",
 };
 
 #define SECS * HZ
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ static unsigned int tcp_timeouts[TCP_CONNTRACK_MAX] __read_mostly = {
 	[TCP_CONNTRACK_LAST_ACK]	= 30 SECS,
 	[TCP_CONNTRACK_TIME_WAIT]	= 2 MINS,
 	[TCP_CONNTRACK_CLOSE]		= 10 SECS,
+	[TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT2]	= 2 MINS,
 };
 
 #define sNO TCP_CONNTRACK_NONE
@@ -93,7 +94,7 @@ static unsigned int tcp_timeouts[TCP_CONNTRACK_MAX] __read_mostly = {
 #define sLA TCP_CONNTRACK_LAST_ACK
 #define sTW TCP_CONNTRACK_TIME_WAIT
 #define sCL TCP_CONNTRACK_CLOSE
-#define sLI TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN
+#define sS2 TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT2
 #define sIV TCP_CONNTRACK_MAX
 #define sIG TCP_CONNTRACK_IGNORE
 
@@ -123,6 +124,7 @@ enum tcp_bit_set {
  *
  * NONE:	initial state
  * SYN_SENT:	SYN-only packet seen
+ * SYN_SENT2:	SYN-only packet seen from reply dir, simultaneous open
  * SYN_RECV:	SYN-ACK packet seen
  * ESTABLISHED:	ACK packet seen
  * FIN_WAIT:	FIN packet seen
@@ -131,26 +133,24 @@ enum tcp_bit_set {
  * TIME_WAIT:	last ACK seen
  * CLOSE:	closed connection (RST)
  *
- * LISTEN state is not used.
- *
  * Packets marked as IGNORED (sIG):
  *	if they may be either invalid or valid
  *	and the receiver may send back a connection
  *	closing RST or a SYN/ACK.
  *
  * Packets marked as INVALID (sIV):
- *	if they are invalid
- *	or we do not support the request (simultaneous open)
+ *	if we regard them as truly invalid packets
  */
 static const u8 tcp_conntracks[2][6][TCP_CONNTRACK_MAX] = {
 	{
 /* ORIGINAL */
-/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sLI	*/
-/*syn*/	   { sSS, sSS, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sSS, sSS, sIV },
+/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sS2	*/
+/*syn*/	   { sSS, sSS, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sSS, sSS, sS2 },
 /*
  *	sNO -> sSS	Initialize a new connection
  *	sSS -> sSS	Retransmitted SYN
- *	sSR -> sIG	Late retransmitted SYN?
+ *	sS2 -> sS2	Late retransmitted SYN
+ *	sSR -> sIG
  *	sES -> sIG	Error: SYNs in window outside the SYN_SENT state
  *			are errors. Receiver will reply with RST
  *			and close the connection.
@@ -161,22 +161,30 @@ static const u8 tcp_conntracks[2][6][TCP_CONNTRACK_MAX] = {
  *	sTW -> sSS	Reopened connection (RFC 1122).
  *	sCL -> sSS
  */
-/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sLI	*/
-/*synack*/ { sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV },
+/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sS2	*/
+/*synack*/ { sIV, sIV, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sSR },
 /*
- * A SYN/ACK from the client is always invalid:
- *	- either it tries to set up a simultaneous open, which is
- *	  not supported;
- *	- or the firewall has just been inserted between the two hosts
- *	  during the session set-up. The SYN will be retransmitted
- *	  by the true client (or it'll time out).
+ *	sNO -> sIV	Too late and no reason to do anything
+ *	sSS -> sIV	Client can't send SYN and then SYN/ACK
+ *	sS2 -> sSR	SYN/ACK sent to SYN2 in simultaneous open
+ *	sSR -> sIG
+ *	sES -> sIG	Error: SYNs in window outside the SYN_SENT state
+ *			are errors. Receiver will reply with RST
+ *			and close the connection.
+ *			Or we are not in sync and hold a dead connection.
+ *	sFW -> sIG
+ *	sCW -> sIG
+ *	sLA -> sIG
+ *	sTW -> sIG
+ *	sCL -> sIG
  */
-/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sLI	*/
+/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sS2	*/
 /*fin*/    { sIV, sIV, sFW, sFW, sLA, sLA, sLA, sTW, sCL, sIV },
 /*
  *	sNO -> sIV	Too late and no reason to do anything...
  *	sSS -> sIV	Client migth not send FIN in this state:
  *			we enforce waiting for a SYN/ACK reply first.
+ *	sS2 -> sIV
  *	sSR -> sFW	Close started.
  *	sES -> sFW
  *	sFW -> sLA	FIN seen in both directions, waiting for
@@ -187,11 +195,12 @@ static const u8 tcp_conntracks[2][6][TCP_CONNTRACK_MAX] = {
  *	sTW -> sTW
  *	sCL -> sCL
  */
-/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sLI	*/
+/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sS2	*/
 /*ack*/	   { sES, sIV, sES, sES, sCW, sCW, sTW, sTW, sCL, sIV },
 /*
  *	sNO -> sES	Assumed.
  *	sSS -> sIV	ACK is invalid: we haven't seen a SYN/ACK yet.
+ *	sS2 -> sIV
  *	sSR -> sES	Established state is reached.
  *	sES -> sES	:-)
  *	sFW -> sCW	Normal close request answered by ACK.
@@ -200,29 +209,31 @@ static const u8 tcp_conntracks[2][6][TCP_CONNTRACK_MAX] = {
  *	sTW -> sTW	Retransmitted last ACK. Remain in the same state.
  *	sCL -> sCL
  */
-/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sLI	*/
-/*rst*/    { sIV, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sIV },
+/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sS2	*/
+/*rst*/    { sIV, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL },
 /*none*/   { sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV }
 	},
 	{
 /* REPLY */
-/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sLI	*/
-/*syn*/	   { sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV },
+/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sS2	*/
+/*syn*/	   { sIV, sS2, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sS2 },
 /*
  *	sNO -> sIV	Never reached.
- *	sSS -> sIV	Simultaneous open, not supported
- *	sSR -> sIV	Simultaneous open, not supported.
- *	sES -> sIV	Server may not initiate a connection.
+ *	sSS -> sS2	Simultaneous open
+ *	sS2 -> sS2	Retransmitted simultaneous SYN
+ *	sSR -> sIV	Invalid SYN packets sent by the server
+ *	sES -> sIV
  *	sFW -> sIV
  *	sCW -> sIV
  *	sLA -> sIV
  *	sTW -> sIV	Reopened connection, but server may not do it.
  *	sCL -> sIV
  */
-/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sLI	*/
-/*synack*/ { sIV, sSR, sSR, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIV },
+/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sS2	*/
+/*synack*/ { sIV, sSR, sSR, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sSR },
 /*
  *	sSS -> sSR	Standard open.
+ *	sS2 -> sSR	Simultaneous open
  *	sSR -> sSR	Retransmitted SYN/ACK.
  *	sES -> sIG	Late retransmitted SYN/ACK?
  *	sFW -> sIG	Might be SYN/ACK answering ignored SYN
@@ -231,10 +242,11 @@ static const u8 tcp_conntracks[2][6][TCP_CONNTRACK_MAX] = {
  *	sTW -> sIG
  *	sCL -> sIG
  */
-/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sLI	*/
+/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sS2	*/
 /*fin*/    { sIV, sIV, sFW, sFW, sLA, sLA, sLA, sTW, sCL, sIV },
 /*
  *	sSS -> sIV	Server might not send FIN in this state.
+ *	sS2 -> sIV
  *	sSR -> sFW	Close started.
  *	sES -> sFW
  *	sFW -> sLA	FIN seen in both directions.
@@ -243,10 +255,11 @@ static const u8 tcp_conntracks[2][6][TCP_CONNTRACK_MAX] = {
  *	sTW -> sTW
  *	sCL -> sCL
  */
-/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sLI	*/
-/*ack*/	   { sIV, sIG, sSR, sES, sCW, sCW, sTW, sTW, sCL, sIV },
+/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sS2	*/
+/*ack*/	   { sIV, sIG, sSR, sES, sCW, sCW, sTW, sTW, sCL, sIG },
 /*
  *	sSS -> sIG	Might be a half-open connection.
+ *	sS2 -> sIG
  *	sSR -> sSR	Might answer late resent SYN.
  *	sES -> sES	:-)
  *	sFW -> sCW	Normal close request answered by ACK.
@@ -255,8 +268,8 @@ static const u8 tcp_conntracks[2][6][TCP_CONNTRACK_MAX] = {
  *	sTW -> sTW	Retransmitted last ACK.
  *	sCL -> sCL
  */
-/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sLI	*/
-/*rst*/    { sIV, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sIV },
+/* 	     sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sS2	*/
+/*rst*/    { sIV, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL, sCL },
 /*none*/   { sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV }
 	}
 };
@@ -521,13 +534,14 @@ static bool tcp_in_window(const struct nf_conn *ct,
 		 receiver->td_end, receiver->td_maxend, receiver->td_maxwin,
 		 receiver->td_scale);
 
-	if (sender->td_end == 0) {
+	if (sender->td_maxwin == 0) {
 		/*
 		 * Initialize sender data.
 		 */
-		if (tcph->syn && tcph->ack) {
+		if (tcph->syn) {
 			/*
-			 * Outgoing SYN-ACK in reply to a SYN.
+			 * SYN-ACK in reply to a SYN
+			 * or SYN from reply direction in simultaneous open.
 			 */
 			sender->td_end =
 			sender->td_maxend = end;
@@ -543,6 +557,9 @@ static bool tcp_in_window(const struct nf_conn *ct,
 			      && receiver->flags & IP_CT_TCP_FLAG_WINDOW_SCALE))
 				sender->td_scale =
 				receiver->td_scale = 0;
+			if (!tcph->ack)
+				/* Simultaneous open */
+				return true;
 		} else {
 			/*
 			 * We are in the middle of a connection,
@@ -1086,7 +1103,7 @@ static bool tcp_new(struct nf_conn *ct, const struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	ct->proto.tcp.seen[1].td_end = 0;
 	ct->proto.tcp.seen[1].td_maxend = 0;
-	ct->proto.tcp.seen[1].td_maxwin = 1;
+	ct->proto.tcp.seen[1].td_maxwin = 0;
 	ct->proto.tcp.seen[1].td_scale = 0;
 
 	/* tcp_packet will set them */
@@ -1327,6 +1344,12 @@ static struct ctl_table tcp_compat_sysctl_table[] = {
 		.mode		= 0644,
 		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_jiffies,
 	},
+		.procname	= "ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_syn_sent2",
+		.data		= &tcp_timeouts[TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT2],
+		.maxlen		= sizeof(unsigned int),
+		.mode		= 0644,
+		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_jiffies,
+	},
 	{
 		.procname	= "ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_syn_recv",
 		.data		= &tcp_timeouts[TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_RECV],
-- 
1.5.4.3

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, kadlec@mail.kfki.hu
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support
  2009-05-31 14:28 [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support Jozsef Kadlecsik
@ 2009-05-31 14:33 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
  2009-05-31 23:04   ` Saatvik Agarwal
  2009-06-02 12:02   ` Patrick McHardy
  2009-06-02 11:32 ` Patrick McHardy
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jozsef Kadlecsik @ 2009-05-31 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter-devel; +Cc: Patrick McHardy, Saatvik Agarwal

On Sun, 31 May 2009, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:

> ---
>  include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp.h |    2 +-
>  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c     |   97 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

Signed-off-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>

Sorry, that line was not added.

Best regards,
Jozseg
-
E-mail  : kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, kadlec@mail.kfki.hu
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support
  2009-05-31 14:33 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
@ 2009-05-31 23:04   ` Saatvik Agarwal
  2009-05-31 23:50     ` Jan Engelhardt
  2009-06-02 12:02   ` Patrick McHardy
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Saatvik Agarwal @ 2009-05-31 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jozsef Kadlecsik; +Cc: netfilter-devel, Patrick McHardy

Hi Jozsef,

Thanks a lot for the patch. What version of the kernel/netfilter code
is this patch intended for? I'm running debian 2.6.26 (lenny) and I
can't patch my source. 14 out of the 15 hunks fail.

I might do a manual merge for now.

Thanks so much once again for the patch. I will try to test it in the
next few days and let you know how it goes.

Best,
Saatvik

On 5/31/09, Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> wrote:
> On Sun, 31 May 2009, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
>
>  > ---
>  >  include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp.h |    2 +-
>  >  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c     |   97 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>  >  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
>
>  Sorry, that line was not added.
>
>  Best regards,
>  Jozseg
>
> -
>  E-mail  : kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, kadlec@mail.kfki.hu
>  PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
>  Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
>           H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support
  2009-05-31 23:04   ` Saatvik Agarwal
@ 2009-05-31 23:50     ` Jan Engelhardt
  2009-06-01  0:50       ` Saatvik Agarwal
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2009-05-31 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Saatvik Agarwal; +Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik, netfilter-devel, Patrick McHardy


On Monday 2009-06-01 01:04, Saatvik Agarwal wrote:

>Hi Jozsef,
>
>Thanks a lot for the patch. What version of the kernel/netfilter code
>is this patch intended for? I'm running debian 2.6.26 (lenny) and I
>can't patch my source. 14 out of the 15 hunks fail.

Often enough, whatever is cooking in Linus's (i.e. 2.6.30-rc currently).

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support
  2009-05-31 23:50     ` Jan Engelhardt
@ 2009-06-01  0:50       ` Saatvik Agarwal
  2009-06-02  8:41         ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Saatvik Agarwal @ 2009-06-01  0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Engelhardt; +Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik, netfilter-devel, Patrick McHardy

Hmm. I tried both the latest RC and the latest stable release. Same
problem. For example, the arrays in chunk 2 & 3 of nf_conntrack_tcp.h
are significantly longer in the latest release than indicated in the
diff. Am I missing something?

Thanks,
Saatvik

On 5/31/09, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> wrote:
>
>  On Monday 2009-06-01 01:04, Saatvik Agarwal wrote:
>
>  >Hi Jozsef,
>  >
>  >Thanks a lot for the patch. What version of the kernel/netfilter code
>  >is this patch intended for? I'm running debian 2.6.26 (lenny) and I
>  >can't patch my source. 14 out of the 15 hunks fail.
>
>
> Often enough, whatever is cooking in Linus's (i.e. 2.6.30-rc currently).
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support
  2009-06-01  0:50       ` Saatvik Agarwal
@ 2009-06-02  8:41         ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jozsef Kadlecsik @ 2009-06-02  8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Saatvik Agarwal; +Cc: Jan Engelhardt, netfilter-devel, Patrick McHardy

On Sun, 31 May 2009, Saatvik Agarwal wrote:

> Hmm. I tried both the latest RC and the latest stable release. Same
> problem. For example, the arrays in chunk 2 & 3 of nf_conntrack_tcp.h
> are significantly longer in the latest release than indicated in the
> diff. Am I missing something?

My patch is on top of the patch

Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:35:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix accepting invalid RST segments

So first you should apply that.

Or pull Patrick's git tree from 
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/kaber/nf-2.6.git

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, kadlec@mail.kfki.hu
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support
  2009-05-31 14:28 [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support Jozsef Kadlecsik
  2009-05-31 14:33 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
@ 2009-06-02 11:32 ` Patrick McHardy
  2009-06-02 11:42   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
  2009-06-02 11:51   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2009-06-02 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jozsef Kadlecsik; +Cc: netfilter-devel, Saatvik Agarwal

Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
> 
> The patch below adds supporting TCP simultaneous open to conntrack. The 
> unused LISTEN state is replaced by a new state (SYN_SENT2) denoting the 
> second SYN sent from the reply direction in the new case. The state table 
> is updated and the function tcp_in_window is modified to handle 
> simultaneous open.
> 
> The functionality can fairly easily be tested by socat. A sample tcpdump 
> recording 
> 
> ...
> and the corresponding netlink events:
> 
>     [NEW] tcp      6 120 SYN_SENT src=192.168.0.254 dst=192.168.0.1 sport=2020 dport=2020 [UNREPLIED] src=192.168.0.1 dst=192.168.0.254 sport=2020 dport=2020
>  [UPDATE] tcp      6 120 LISTEN src=192.168.0.254 dst=192.168.0.1 sport=2020 dport=2020 src=192.168.0.1 dst=192.168.0.254 sport=2020 dport=2020
>  [UPDATE] tcp      6 60 SYN_RECV src=192.168.0.254 dst=192.168.0.1 sport=2020 dport=2020 src=192.168.0.1 dst=192.168.0.254 sport=2020 dport=2020
>  [UPDATE] tcp      6 432000 ESTABLISHED src=192.168.0.254 dst=192.168.0.1 sport=2020 dport=2020 src=192.168.0.1 dst=192.168.0.254 sport=2020 dport=2020 [ASSURED]
> 
> The RST packet was dropped in the raw table, thus it did not reach 
> conntrack.  nfnetlink_conntrack is unpatched so it shows the new SYN_SENT2 
> state as the old unused LISTEN.
> 
> With TCP simultaneous open support we satisfy REQ-2 in RFC 5382 ;-).
> 
> Additional minor correction in this patch is that in order to catch
> uninitialized reply directions, "td_maxwin == 0" is used instead of
> "td_end == 0" because the former can't be true except in uninitialized
> state while td_end may accidentally be equal to zero in the mid of a
> connection.

Thanks Jozsef. Just one question:

> -	TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN,
> +	TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT2,

is this constant already used in userspace? From your conntrack
output above I'd assume the answer is yes, so we should keep it
around as an alias to avoid compilation errors.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support
  2009-06-02 11:32 ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2009-06-02 11:42   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
  2009-06-02 11:51   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2009-06-02 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik, netfilter-devel, Saatvik Agarwal

Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> The patch below adds supporting TCP simultaneous open to conntrack.
>> The unused LISTEN state is replaced by a new state (SYN_SENT2)
>> denoting the second SYN sent from the reply direction in the new case.
>> The state table is updated and the function tcp_in_window is modified
>> to handle simultaneous open.
>>
>> The functionality can fairly easily be tested by socat. A sample
>> tcpdump recording
>> ...
>> and the corresponding netlink events:
>>
>>     [NEW] tcp      6 120 SYN_SENT src=192.168.0.254 dst=192.168.0.1
>> sport=2020 dport=2020 [UNREPLIED] src=192.168.0.1 dst=192.168.0.254
>> sport=2020 dport=2020
>>  [UPDATE] tcp      6 120 LISTEN src=192.168.0.254 dst=192.168.0.1
>> sport=2020 dport=2020 src=192.168.0.1 dst=192.168.0.254 sport=2020
>> dport=2020
>>  [UPDATE] tcp      6 60 SYN_RECV src=192.168.0.254 dst=192.168.0.1
>> sport=2020 dport=2020 src=192.168.0.1 dst=192.168.0.254 sport=2020
>> dport=2020
>>  [UPDATE] tcp      6 432000 ESTABLISHED src=192.168.0.254
>> dst=192.168.0.1 sport=2020 dport=2020 src=192.168.0.1
>> dst=192.168.0.254 sport=2020 dport=2020 [ASSURED]
>>
>> The RST packet was dropped in the raw table, thus it did not reach
>> conntrack.  nfnetlink_conntrack is unpatched so it shows the new
>> SYN_SENT2 state as the old unused LISTEN.
>>
>> With TCP simultaneous open support we satisfy REQ-2 in RFC 5382 ;-).
>>
>> Additional minor correction in this patch is that in order to catch
>> uninitialized reply directions, "td_maxwin == 0" is used instead of
>> "td_end == 0" because the former can't be true except in uninitialized
>> state while td_end may accidentally be equal to zero in the mid of a
>> connection.
> 
> Thanks Jozsef. Just one question:
> 
>> -    TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN,
>> +    TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT2,
> 
> is this constant already used in userspace? From your conntrack
> output above I'd assume the answer is yes, so we should keep it
> around as an alias to avoid compilation errors.

libnetfilter_conntrack keeps its own copy of it in user-space. libnl
seems not to do it, so the alias would be a good idea.

-- 
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support
  2009-06-02 11:32 ` Patrick McHardy
  2009-06-02 11:42   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2009-06-02 11:51   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
  2009-06-02 11:53     ` Patrick McHardy
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jozsef Kadlecsik @ 2009-06-02 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: netfilter-devel, Saatvik Agarwal

Hi Patrick,

On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> Thanks Jozsef. Just one question:
> 
> > -	TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN,
> > +	TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT2,
> 
> is this constant already used in userspace? From your conntrack
> output above I'd assume the answer is yes, so we should keep it
> around as an alias to avoid compilation errors.

libnetfilter_conntrack has got it's own header file which defines 
TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN and it's string interpretation as "LISTEN" state. 
'conntrack' relies on libnetfilter_conntrack when translating the 
numerical id received from the kernel to the string value, that is the 
reason for the "misinterpretation" of the state. So from 
libnetfilter_conntrack and conntrack-tools point of view we can safely 
remove TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN.

I'm not aware of any project which would use the kernel header file 
directly, but that does not mean there isn't any. We might keep the 
symbol, of course. Shall I resend the patch with TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN 
preserved?

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, kadlec@mail.kfki.hu
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support
  2009-06-02 11:51   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
@ 2009-06-02 11:53     ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2009-06-02 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jozsef Kadlecsik; +Cc: netfilter-devel, Saatvik Agarwal

Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
> 
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>> Thanks Jozsef. Just one question:
>>
>>> -	TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN,
>>> +	TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT2,
>> is this constant already used in userspace? From your conntrack
>> output above I'd assume the answer is yes, so we should keep it
>> around as an alias to avoid compilation errors.
> 
> libnetfilter_conntrack has got it's own header file which defines 
> TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN and it's string interpretation as "LISTEN" state. 
> 'conntrack' relies on libnetfilter_conntrack when translating the 
> numerical id received from the kernel to the string value, that is the 
> reason for the "misinterpretation" of the state. So from 
> libnetfilter_conntrack and conntrack-tools point of view we can safely 
> remove TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN.
> 
> I'm not aware of any project which would use the kernel header file 
> directly, but that does not mean there isn't any. We might keep the 
> symbol, of course. Shall I resend the patch with TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN 
> preserved?

Thanks for the explanation. I think we should keep it around just
to make sure. No need to resend though, I'll just add it myself.

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support
  2009-05-31 14:33 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
  2009-05-31 23:04   ` Saatvik Agarwal
@ 2009-06-02 12:02   ` Patrick McHardy
  2009-06-02 12:09     ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2009-06-02 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jozsef Kadlecsik; +Cc: netfilter-devel, Saatvik Agarwal

Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> On Sun, 31 May 2009, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> 
>> ---
>>  include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp.h |    2 +-
>>  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c     |   97 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
> 
> Sorry, that line was not added.

Applied to nf-next.git, thanks Jozsef. I've made two minor changes:

- keep TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN around to avoid userspace compilation
   errors and make the new state a #define to be able to check for
   it using the preprocessor:

	TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN,	/* obsolete */
#define TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT2	TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN

- fixed a compilation error resulting from a missing '{':

>  		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_jiffies,
>  	},
> +		.procname	= "ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_syn_sent2",
> +		.data		= &tcp_timeouts[TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT2],


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support
  2009-06-02 12:02   ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2009-06-02 12:09     ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
  2009-06-02 12:12       ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jozsef Kadlecsik @ 2009-06-02 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: netfilter-devel, Saatvik Agarwal

On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 May 2009, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> > 
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp.h |    2 +-
> > >  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c     |   97
> > > +++++++++++++++++-----------
> > >  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
> > 
> > Sorry, that line was not added.
> 
> Applied to nf-next.git, thanks Jozsef. I've made two minor changes:
> 
> - keep TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN around to avoid userspace compilation
>   errors and make the new state a #define to be able to check for
>   it using the preprocessor:
> 
> 	TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN,	/* obsolete */
> #define TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT2	TCP_CONNTRACK_LISTEN
> 
> - fixed a compilation error resulting from a missing '{':
> 
> >  		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_jiffies,
> >  	},
> > +		.procname	= "ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_syn_sent2",
> > +		.data		= &tcp_timeouts[TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT2],

That's a copy-paste bug, sorry: I have to run a slighty older kernel 
release on my test system and I selected the paste area one line off.

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, kadlec@mail.kfki.hu
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support
  2009-06-02 12:09     ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
@ 2009-06-02 12:12       ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2009-06-02 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jozsef Kadlecsik; +Cc: netfilter-devel, Saatvik Agarwal

Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>>
>>>  		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_jiffies,
>>>  	},
>>> +		.procname	= "ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_syn_sent2",
>>> +		.data		= &tcp_timeouts[TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT2],
> 
> That's a copy-paste bug, sorry: I have to run a slighty older kernel 
> release on my test system and I selected the paste area one line off.

Don't worry, I've seen worse problems with patches :)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-02 12:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-31 14:28 [PATCH] TCP simultaneous open support Jozsef Kadlecsik
2009-05-31 14:33 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2009-05-31 23:04   ` Saatvik Agarwal
2009-05-31 23:50     ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-06-01  0:50       ` Saatvik Agarwal
2009-06-02  8:41         ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2009-06-02 12:02   ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-02 12:09     ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2009-06-02 12:12       ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-02 11:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-02 11:42   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-06-02 11:51   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2009-06-02 11:53     ` Patrick McHardy

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).