From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [resend net-next] socket: Added 'transparent' option Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:08:09 +0200 Message-ID: <4A27F169.9090003@trash.net> References: <1244122013-25970-1-git-send-email-panther@balabit.hu> <4A27CD5A.6040303@trash.net> <4A27E7F0.6010403@balabit.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Laszlo Attila Toth , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:35840 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753646AbZFDQIK (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:08:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Thursday 2009-06-04 17:27, Laszlo Attila Toth wrote: > Also, if possible, try combining all the TBF implementations; limit > and hashlimit are so close to each other, the latter would only need > a "--hashlimit-mode notuple" (from a userspace pov) , and xt_limit > could be obsoleted. If we're going to touch the ABI and add a new revision, we should at the same time try to get rid of the resolution problems so we don't need yet another reversion when someone finally fixes this.