netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
To: paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
	netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	urs.thuermann-l29pVbxQd1IUtdQbppsyvg@public.gmane.org,
	oliver.hartkopp-l29pVbxQd1IUtdQbppsyvg@public.gmane.org,
	wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org,
	sri-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-sctp-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	netfilter-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sctp: protocol.c call rcu_barrier() on unload.
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:26:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2E8D31.1030307@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090609155011.GD6789-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>

Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:44:23AM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 03:11:43PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>>>> On module unload call rcu_barrier(), this is needed as synchronize_rcu()
>>>> is not strong enough.  The kmem_cache_destroy() does invoke
>>>> synchronize_rcu() but it does not provide same protection.
>>> Good, looks like sctp_v4_del_protocol() invokes call_rcu(), which the
>>> rcu_barrier() would then wait for.  And it looks like sctp_v6_del_protocol()
>>> does the same for IPv6.
>>>
>>> Reviewed_by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>  net/sctp/protocol.c |    2 ++
>>>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
>>>> index cb2c50d..79cbd47 100644
>>>> --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
>>>> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
>>>> @@ -1370,6 +1370,8 @@ SCTP_STATIC __exit void sctp_exit(void)
>>>>  	sctp_proc_exit();
>>>>  	cleanup_sctp_mibs();
>>>>
>>>> +	rcu_barrier(); /* Wait for completion of call_rcu()'s */
>>>> +
>>>>  	kmem_cache_destroy(sctp_chunk_cachep);
>>>>  	kmem_cache_destroy(sctp_bucket_cachep);
>>>>  }
>> Shouldn't the rcu_barrier call be before sctp_free_local_addr_list()?
> 
> Hmmm...  What sequence of events would lead to a failure if
> rcu_barrier() is after sctp_free_local_addr_list()?
> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 

I thought that the notifier could could potentially execute at the
same time as the unregister(), but I see that's protected.  So, I guess
it doesn't really matter then where the barrier is.

Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>

-vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-09 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-08 13:11 [PATCH 0/5] We must use rcu_barrier() on module unload Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-08 13:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] 8021q: Vlan driver should use rcu_barrier() on unload instead of syncronize_net() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-08 15:54   ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-08 13:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] nfnetlink_queue: Use rcu_barrier() on module unload Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-08 16:05   ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-10  5:38   ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-08 13:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] can: af_can.c use " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-08 13:24   ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-06-10  8:10     ` David Miller
2009-06-10 10:02       ` Alan Cox
2009-06-10 11:33       ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-06-08 16:13   ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-08 17:00     ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-06-08 13:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] sctp: protocol.c call rcu_barrier() on unload Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-08 16:22   ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-09 15:44     ` Vlad Yasevich
2009-06-09 15:50       ` Paul E. McKenney
     [not found]         ` <20090609155011.GD6789-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-09 16:26           ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2009-06-08 13:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] sunrpc/auth_gss: Call rcu_barrier() on module unload Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-08 16:26   ` Paul E. McKenney
     [not found]     ` <20090608162656.GF6961-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 17:00       ` Trond Myklebust
2009-06-08 14:00 ` [PATCH 0/5] We must use " Patrick McHardy
2009-06-10  8:11 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A2E8D31.1030307@hp.com \
    --to=vladislav.yasevich-vxdhtt5mjny@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=oliver.hartkopp-l29pVbxQd1IUtdQbppsyvg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sri-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=urs.thuermann-l29pVbxQd1IUtdQbppsyvg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).