* Re: [PATCH] conntrack: use fscanf() instead of read() for showing counter
[not found] <20091007162834.13930.14962.stgit@lb64>
@ 2009-10-08 16:07 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2009-10-08 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hannes Eder; +Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist
Hannes Eder wrote:
> Read an integer right away with fscanf() instead of read()-ing to a
> buffer, which was actually to small for the terminating '\0', and
> atoi()-ing. Furthermore read() might not read enough, though unlikely
> here.
Also applied, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-10-08 16:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20091007162834.13930.14962.stgit@lb64>
2009-10-08 16:07 ` [PATCH] conntrack: use fscanf() instead of read() for showing counter Pablo Neira Ayuso
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).