* [Fwd: Re: libnetfilter_conntrack]
@ 2009-12-18 9:29 Zdenek Vasicek
2009-12-23 22:08 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zdenek Vasicek @ 2009-12-18 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
Dear authors,
I would like to ask you about help. I have installed latest version of
the libnetfilter_conntrack (libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.100,
libnfnetlink-1.0.0) and I have found that the src and dest address
(ipv4) as well as src and dest port are always empty (zero). However, if
I look into /proc/net/nf_conntrack, everything is ok. The kernel version
is 2.6.32.
Example:
libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.100/utils/conntrack_dump
ipv4 2 tcp 6 431999 src=0.0.0.0 dst=0.0.0.0 sport=0 dport=0
packets=13087 bytes=851624 src=0.0.0.0 dst=0.0.0.0 sport=0 dport=0
packets=14940 bytes=8636188 [ASSURED] mark=0 use=2
/proc/net/nf_conntrack
ipv4 2 tcp 6 431999 ESTABLISHED src=147.229.13.xx
dst=147.229.14.xx sport=40868 dport=22 packets=13236 bytes=861344
src=147.229.14.xx dst=147.229.....
Can you please help me to solve this bug? I didn't have any problems
with conntrack and ulog before. I suppose that there must to be
incompatibility between kernel and libnetfilter.
Best regards,
Zdenek Vasicek
>pleaes contact netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
>--
>- Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
>============================================================================
>"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: Re: libnetfilter_conntrack]
2009-12-18 9:29 [Fwd: Re: libnetfilter_conntrack] Zdenek Vasicek
@ 2009-12-23 22:08 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2009-12-23 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zdenek Vasicek; +Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist
Zdenek Vasicek wrote:
> Dear authors,
> I would like to ask you about help. I have installed latest version of
> the libnetfilter_conntrack (libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.100,
> libnfnetlink-1.0.0) and I have found that the src and dest address
> (ipv4) as well as src and dest port are always empty (zero). However, if
> I look into /proc/net/nf_conntrack, everything is ok. The kernel version
> is 2.6.32.
>
> Example:
> libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.100/utils/conntrack_dump
> ipv4 2 tcp 6 431999 src=0.0.0.0 dst=0.0.0.0 sport=0 dport=0
> packets=13087 bytes=851624 src=0.0.0.0 dst=0.0.0.0 sport=0 dport=0
> packets=14940 bytes=8636188 [ASSURED] mark=0 use=2
>
> /proc/net/nf_conntrack
> ipv4 2 tcp 6 431999 ESTABLISHED src=147.229.13.xx
> dst=147.229.14.xx sport=40868 dport=22 packets=13236 bytes=861344
> src=147.229.14.xx dst=147.229.....
>
> Can you please help me to solve this bug? I didn't have any problems
> with conntrack and ulog before. I suppose that there must to be
> incompatibility between kernel and libnetfilter.
There's a similar bug in bugzilla.netfilter.org [1], for some reason the
kernel is not including the address and the port in the messages sent to
userspace. Could you send me your .config file?
[1] http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-23 22:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-18 9:29 [Fwd: Re: libnetfilter_conntrack] Zdenek Vasicek
2009-12-23 22:08 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).