From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, pekkas@netcore.fi, jmorris@namei.org,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
david@blue-labs.org, jorge@dti2.net, opurdila@ixiacom.com,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2]IP: Send an ICMP "Fragment Reassembly Timeout" message when enabling connection track
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:48:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B599084.1060406@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B590BE3.40509@cn.fujitsu.com>
Shan Wei wrote:
> [PATCH v2]IP: Send an ICMP "Fragment Reassembly Timeout" message when enabling connection track
>
> No matter whether connection track is enabled, an end host should send
> an ICMPv4 "Fragment Reassembly Timeout" message when defrag timeout.
> The reasons are following two points:
>
> 1. RFC 792 says:
> >>>> >> > > If a host reassembling a fragmented datagram cannot complete the
> >>>> >> > > reassembly due to missing fragments within its time limit it
> >>>> >> > > discards the datagram, and it may send a time exceeded message.
> >>>> >> > >
> >>>> >> > > If fragment zero is not available then no time exceeded need be
> >>>> >> > > sent at all.
> >>>> >> > >
> >>>> >> > > Read more: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc792.html#ixzz0aOXRD7Wp
>
> 2. Patrick McHardy also agrees with this opinion. :-)
> About the discussion of this opinion, refer to http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/41649
>
> The patch fixed the problem like this:
> When enabling connection track, fragments are received at PRE_ROUTING HOOK.
> If they are failed to reassemble, ip_expire() will be called.
> Before sending an ICMP "Fragment Reassembly Timeout" message,
> the patch searches router table to get the destination entry only for host type.
>
> The patch has been tested on both host type and route type.
Looks good to me. Would you mind adding a similar change to IPv6
(net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-22 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-21 1:21 [PATCH]IP: Send an ICMP "Fragment Reassembly Timeout" message when enabling connection track Shan Wei
2010-01-21 12:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-01-22 2:22 ` [PATCH v2]IP: " Shan Wei
2010-01-22 11:48 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2010-01-23 9:58 ` David Miller
2010-01-25 0:57 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
2010-01-25 8:18 ` Shan Wei
[not found] ` <201001250057.o0P0v76J005243@toshiba.co.jp>
2010-01-26 1:25 ` Shan Wei
2010-01-26 2:34 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B599084.1060406@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@blue-labs.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=jorge@dti2.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).