From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/09]: netfilter: xtables: add CT target Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:36:55 +0100 Message-ID: <4B5DD6B7.9040003@trash.net> References: <20100125153732.15305.68011.sendpatchset@x2.localnet> <20100125153740.15305.76374.sendpatchset@x2.localnet> <4B5DCB63.7020704@trash.net> <4B5DCD6E.4070103@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:48245 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754067Ab0AYRg7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:36:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Monday 2010-01-25 17:57, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> Does anyone have an opinion on supporting specifying helper parameters? >> I'm considering adding something like 5 generically usable u32s and have >> helpers initialize parameters like FTP "loose" or SIP "direct_media" >> based on those. >> > Is there a case where someone wants to loosen just half of their > FTP connections? Well yes maybe there is, but anyone ever request > it? Not FTP specifically, SIP and H.323 would be the primary use cases. But if the infrastructure is there anyways, we might as well add support for FTP.