From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/09]: netfilter: CT target/conntrack zones
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:05:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B5EF6A4.6000201@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100125153732.15305.68011.sendpatchset@x2.localnet>
Hi Patrick,
Sorry for the silence, we're in the exams season since last week and
that nuts a lot.
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> The following patches contain a new version of the conntrack zones
> patchset, including a new xtables target to (among other things) assign
> conntracks to a specific zone, replacing the device attribute used
> in the previous version.
>
> Quick overview:
>
> - Patch 1 adds a struct net * parameter to the xtables target parameter
> structures as preparation for the CT target, which needs to allocate
> a conntrack entry in the proper namespace
>
> - Patch 2 splits up the IPCT_STATUS event as requested by Jozsef. The
> CT target can be used for selective conntrack event delivery, this
> allows more fine grained control over the delivered events.
This is indeed interesting.
> - Patch 3 adds selective conntrack event delivery by adding two masks
> for conntrack and expectation events to struct nf_conntrack_ecache,
> which are used to filter out events.
This feature is something that I wanted since time ago. We can reduce
the CPU consumption by reducing the amount of events. This is
particularly good for ulogd2 and conntrackd.
My experiments showed that the BSF-based filtering does not provide any
significant gain from filtering Netlink message in user-space. The
problem is that we have to spend cycles building the message which seems
to be costly.
AFAICS, this approach has one minor threat since it applies to all
processes (I'm sure you're aware of it). I'm fine with this anyway, but
maybe we should think of some way to make it per-process at some point?
Some netlink unicast-based reporting similar to what NFLOG and NFQUEUE
would solve this issue although they are implementing multicast over
netlink unicast.
> - Patch 4 fixes ctnetlink to only assign helpers for matching protocols
> to conntrack entries and fixes expectation deletion by helper name.
> This is also preparation for the CT target, which can also assign
> helpers to new connections.
>
> - Patch 5 adds support for conntrack templates, which are specially marked
> conntrack entries attached to the skb that are used to initialize
> specific parameters of new connections.
>
> - Patch 6 adds the CT target
>
> - Patch 7 contains preparatory work for assigning conntracks to zones:
> the template needs to be passed to L4 ->error handlers for ICMP and
> ICMPv6 to perform the conntrack lookup in the correct zone
>
> - Patch 8 adds zone support to nf_conntrack and the CT target. This works
> by incorporating a numerical "zone" identifier into the conntrack/NAT
> hashes and comparing it during lookups.
>
> - Patch 9 adds zone support to ctnetlink by dumping and parsing a new
> CTA_ZONE attribute that contains the zone ID.
This conntrack zone stuff seems interesting. I'll add support for this
to libnetfilter_conntrack. Kudos on you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-26 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-25 15:37 [PATCH 00/09]: netfilter: CT target/conntrack zones Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 15:37 ` [PATCH 01/09]: netfilter: add struct net * to target parameters Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 15:37 ` [PATCH 02/09]: netfilter: nf_conntrack: split up IPCT_STATUS event Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 15:37 ` [PATCH 03/09]: netfilter: ctnetlink: support selective event delivery Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 15:37 ` [PATCH 04/09]: netfilter: ctnetlink: only assign helpers for matching protocols Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 15:37 ` [PATCH 05/09]: netfilter: nf_conntrack: support conntrack templates Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 15:37 ` [PATCH 06/09]: netfilter: xtables: add CT target Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 16:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-01-25 16:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 16:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-01-25 16:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 17:33 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-01-25 17:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 15:37 ` [PATCH 07/09]: netfilter: nf_conntrack: pass template to l4proto ->error handler Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 15:37 ` [PATCH 08/09]: netfilter: nf_conntrack: add support for "conntrack zones" Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 16:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-01-25 16:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 15:37 ` [PATCH 09/09]: netfilter: ctnetlink: add zone support Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 16:37 ` [PATCH 00/09]: netfilter: CT target/conntrack zones Jan Engelhardt
2010-01-25 16:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-01-25 16:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-01-26 14:05 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2010-01-26 14:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-01-26 18:44 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B5EF6A4.6000201@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).