From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.33] conntrack: restrict runtime hashsize modifications
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:21:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6BF111.60205@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265364761.2861.757.camel@tonnant>
Jon Masters wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 11:03 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Jon Masters wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 18:04 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>>>> How about alternatively moving nf_conntrack_hsize into the
>>>>> per-namespace struct? It doesn't look more complicated or
>>>>> intrusive and would allow to still change the init_net
>>>>> hashsize. Also seems less hackish :)
>>>> How about this (so far untested) patch? The htable_size is moved into
>>>> the per-namespace struct and initialized from the current (global)
>>>> value of nf_conntrack_htable_size. Changes through sysfs are still
>>>> permitted, but only affect the init namespace and newly created ones.
>>> I moved the random seed into the per-ns context aswell. I think that's
>>> better than having a global one, and you don't need to rehash all.
>> That's another possibility. But we don't loose anything by not
>> reseeding during resize. It also shouldn't be possible to determine
>> the seed from userspace in a namespace, so there's no real need
>> to use seperate values.
>
> Right, the risk there is hypothetical at best. But there's little lost
> in putting it in per-ns and then you can rehash and truly make them
> independent, which I think is really what netns is all about.
I don't disagree, but currently I'm trying to go for a minimal
version thats suitable for 2.6.33.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-05 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-03 20:39 [PATCH for 2.6.33] conntrack: restrict runtime hashsize modifications Alexey Dobriyan
2010-02-03 20:50 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-04 16:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-04 16:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-04 20:18 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-05 10:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-05 10:14 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-05 10:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-04 17:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-04 19:47 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-02-04 20:23 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-05 10:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-05 10:11 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-05 10:19 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-05 11:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-05 11:19 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-02-05 11:22 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-05 11:25 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-05 11:51 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-05 11:23 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-02-05 22:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-02-08 13:34 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-08 14:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-04 20:20 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-05 10:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-05 10:12 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-05 10:21 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2010-02-04 17:26 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B6BF111.60205@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).