From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, jonathan@jonmasters.org,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.33] conntrack: restrict runtime hashsize modifications
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:16:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6BFE29.1040204@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B6BEC23.8020101@trash.net>
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>>> How about this (so far untested) patch? The htable_size is moved into
>>> the per-namespace struct and initialized from the current (global)
>>> value of nf_conntrack_htable_size. Changes through sysfs are still
>>> permitted, but only affect the init namespace and newly created ones.
>> No matter what we do, it's a hack!
>>
>>> Additionally I removed reinitializing the hash random value when
>>> changing the hash size since that also requires to rehash in all
>>> namespaces.
>> I'm not fond of this, because we're not even closely going to allow changing
>> hashtable size per-netns. As such having actual per-netns hashtable size
>> just slows down everything.
>
> Actually it doesn't seem like much more work to allow changing
> table size, the main problem is that sysfs module parameters
> don't seem to fit into the network namespace model at all.
>
> Please be more specific about your suspected slowdowns.
> What's "everything"? What's different about the hashsize
> compared to the many members we already moved to per-netns
> structs?
OK testing looks fine, although I'm quite surprised that its actually
possible to change module parameters from within non-init namespaces.
How is this supposed to work at all? I don't see how sysfs could
possibly provide a network namespace context ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-05 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-03 20:39 [PATCH for 2.6.33] conntrack: restrict runtime hashsize modifications Alexey Dobriyan
2010-02-03 20:50 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-04 16:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-04 16:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-04 20:18 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-05 10:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-05 10:14 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-05 10:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-04 17:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-04 19:47 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-02-04 20:23 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-05 10:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-05 10:11 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-05 10:19 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-05 11:16 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2010-02-05 11:19 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-02-05 11:22 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-05 11:25 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-05 11:51 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-05 11:23 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-02-05 22:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-02-08 13:34 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-08 14:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-04 20:20 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-05 10:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-05 10:12 ` Jon Masters
2010-02-05 10:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-04 17:26 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B6BFE29.1040204@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).