From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] netfilter: xtables: compact table hook functions (1/2) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:22:28 +0100 Message-ID: <4B72CF34.6000701@trash.net> References: <1265813954-13854-1-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> <1265813954-13854-2-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:52935 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753151Ab0BJPWf (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:22:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1265813954-13854-2-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arptable_filter.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arptable_filter.c > index 9733760..78bb72e 100644 > --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arptable_filter.c > +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arptable_filter.c > @@ -53,43 +53,38 @@ static const struct xt_table packet_filter = { > }; > > /* The work comes in here from netfilter.c */ > -static unsigned int arpt_in_hook(unsigned int hook, > +static unsigned int arptable_filter_hook(unsigned int hook, > struct sk_buff *skb, > const struct net_device *in, > const struct net_device *out, > int (*okfn)(struct sk_buff *)) I'm fine with this patch, but can we please keep the arguments aligned neatly? As I said previously, I've let this slip too often, but intend not to in the future.