From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] netfilter: xtables: add const qualifiers Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:06:57 +0100 Message-ID: <4B742B21.9040300@trash.net> References: <1265823547-10358-1-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> <1265823547-10358-7-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> <4B73C740.5020003@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:44967 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755859Ab0BKQHA (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:07:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Thursday 2010-02-11 10:00, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>> +static inline const struct ip6t_entry_target * >>> +ip6t_get_target_c(const struct ip6t_entry *e) >>> +{ >>> + return ip6t_get_target((struct ip6t_entry *)e); >>> +} >>> + >> I would prefer a macro over these get_target_c functions. > > Why so? Because it avoids having a function for const and one for non-const.