From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for February 18 (netfilter)
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:04:37 +0100
Message-ID: <4B7D8135.9040100@trash.net>
References: <20100218204937.54a613d2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4B7D70D0.9090003@oracle.com> <4B7D72FF.4010401@trash.net> <4B7D7617.9070600@oracle.com> <4B7D7CAA.1070605@trash.net> <4B7D7DD0.4050802@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B7D7DD0.4050802@oracle.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 02/18/10 09:45, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Ah I see, we must not include nf_conntrack.h at all. Eventually
>> we need to fix this properly by making nf_conntrack.h usable
>> even with NF_CONNTRACK=n, but that's a more complicated change.
>>
>> This patch works fine for me using your config:
>>
> 
> Ack.  Thanks.
> 

Thanks, I'll send it upstream shortly.