From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Douglas Diniz <dgdiniz@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Afi Gjermund <afigjermund@gmail.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nf_conntrack_count versus '/proc/net/nf_conntrack | wc -l' count
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:22:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7D8567.2060301@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5415ae081002181012x4f7c95a4ncec563f69ae3562e@mail.gmail.com>
Douglas Diniz wrote:
> I'm facing the same problem. I'm working in a embedded system with
> kernel 2.6.20-6. When I send a ping (or any other protocol) through
> eth0 to eth1 (or vice versa) the conntrack count isn't decremented. If
> I send the ping through any other interface (eth0 to wifi, eth1 to
> wifi, wifi to eth0 and wifi to eth1) I have no problem.
> The problem seems to be only between the ethernet interfaces.
> I debug the netfilter and I saw that when the problem occurs the "use"
> variable inside conntract structure in > 1, so this variable is only
> decremented by 1, not reaching in 0, and then the destroy_conntrack
> function is not called.
>
> So I think that the problem is more low level, and some events aren't
> reaching netfilter, and the "use"variable isn't decremented properly.
>
> This could be a problem with the ethernet driver?
Yes, although you'd likely notice other effects like running
out of memory if it was leaking the packets.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-18 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-15 17:27 nf_conntrack_count versus '/proc/net/nf_conntrack | wc -l' count Afi Gjermund
2010-02-15 17:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-15 17:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-02-15 18:04 ` Afi Gjermund
2010-02-15 19:00 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-02-15 19:30 ` Afi Gjermund
2010-02-15 19:45 ` Afi Gjermund
2010-02-15 20:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-02-15 20:33 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-02-15 21:08 ` Afi Gjermund
2010-02-15 21:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-02-15 22:00 ` Afi Gjermund
2010-02-15 22:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-02-15 22:10 ` Afi Gjermund
2010-02-18 17:40 ` Afi Gjermund
2010-02-18 17:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-02-18 17:55 ` Afi Gjermund
2010-02-18 18:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-02-18 18:13 ` Afi Gjermund
2010-02-18 18:19 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-18 19:39 ` Afi Gjermund
2010-02-19 0:53 ` Afi Gjermund
2010-02-19 14:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-02-19 14:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-18 18:12 ` Douglas Diniz
2010-02-18 18:22 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2010-02-18 18:35 ` Douglas Diniz
2010-02-15 21:17 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B7D8567.2060301@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=afigjermund@gmail.com \
--cc=dgdiniz@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).