From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: nf_conntrack_reasm: properly handle packets fragmented into a single fragment
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:28:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7ECA2A.1070900@trash.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 77 bytes --]
Yasuyuki, could you please have a look whether this patch is fine?
Thanks!
[-- Attachment #2: 04.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1908 bytes --]
commit 9e2dcf72023d1447f09c47d77c99b0c49659e5ce
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Date: Fri Feb 19 18:18:37 2010 +0100
netfilter: nf_conntrack_reasm: properly handle packets fragmented into a single fragment
When an ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG message is received with a MTU below 1280,
all further packets include a fragment header.
Unlike regular defragmentation, conntrack also needs to "reassemble"
those fragments in order to obtain a packet without the fragment
header for connection tracking. Currently nf_conntrack_reasm checks
whether a fragment has either IP6_MF set or an offset != 0, which
makes it ignore those fragments.
Remove the invalid check and make reassembly handle fragment queues
containing only a single fragment.
Reported-and-tested-by: Ulrich Weber <uweber@astaro.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
index ad1fcda..f1171b7 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ nf_ct_frag6_reasm(struct nf_ct_frag6_queue *fq, struct net_device *dev)
/* all original skbs are linked into the NFCT_FRAG6_CB(head).orig */
fp = skb_shinfo(head)->frag_list;
- if (NFCT_FRAG6_CB(fp)->orig == NULL)
+ if (fp && NFCT_FRAG6_CB(fp)->orig == NULL)
/* at above code, head skb is divided into two skbs. */
fp = fp->next;
@@ -595,12 +595,6 @@ struct sk_buff *nf_ct_frag6_gather(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 user)
hdr = ipv6_hdr(clone);
fhdr = (struct frag_hdr *)skb_transport_header(clone);
- if (!(fhdr->frag_off & htons(0xFFF9))) {
- pr_debug("Invalid fragment offset\n");
- /* It is not a fragmented frame */
- goto ret_orig;
- }
-
if (atomic_read(&nf_init_frags.mem) > nf_init_frags.high_thresh)
nf_ct_frag6_evictor();
reply other threads:[~2010-02-19 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B7ECA2A.1070900@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).