netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Inclusion inquiry about remaining patches
@ 2010-02-24 10:18 Jan Engelhardt
  2010-02-24 12:41 ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2010-02-24 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kaber; +Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List

Hi,


there are about 70 patches left that I intended to submit, but it seems 
Netfilter stagnated again this release. Is there still a chance for 
inclusion in this round?


thanks,
Jan


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Inclusion inquiry about remaining patches
  2010-02-24 10:18 Inclusion inquiry about remaining patches Jan Engelhardt
@ 2010-02-24 12:41 ` Patrick McHardy
  2010-02-24 14:48   ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2010-02-24 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Engelhardt; +Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> there are about 70 patches left that I intended to submit, but it seems 
> Netfilter stagnated again this release. Is there still a chance for 
> inclusion in this round?

Well, the last batch didn't exactly fill me with confidence that
these patches have been sufficiently tested.

I'll consider the cleanup batch if you can assure me that it
doesn't contain bugs similar to the "lost POSTROUTING chain"
problem contained in the last series that should have been
noticed with just some basic testing.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Inclusion inquiry about remaining patches
  2010-02-24 12:41 ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2010-02-24 14:48   ` Jan Engelhardt
  2010-02-24 14:57     ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2010-02-24 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List

On Wednesday 2010-02-24 13:41, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> 
>> there are about 70 patches left that I intended to submit, but it seems 
>> Netfilter stagnated again this release. Is there still a chance for 
>> inclusion in this round?
>
>Well, the last batch didn't exactly fill me with confidence that
>these patches have been sufficiently tested.
>
>I'll consider the cleanup batch if you can assure me that it
>doesn't contain bugs similar to the "lost POSTROUTING chain"
>problem contained in the last series that should have been
>noticed with just some basic testing.

They have had their testing, and the error had been caught too
by Changli merely by reading the patch:

http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=125732159605634&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=125733769630550&w=2

I still have blob 685400 in my working copy, though it seems unreachable 
at this time, which means it sometime got lost in a rebase.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Inclusion inquiry about remaining patches
  2010-02-24 14:48   ` Jan Engelhardt
@ 2010-02-24 14:57     ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2010-02-24 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Engelhardt; +Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Wednesday 2010-02-24 13:41, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> there are about 70 patches left that I intended to submit, but it seems 
>>> Netfilter stagnated again this release. Is there still a chance for 
>>> inclusion in this round?
>> Well, the last batch didn't exactly fill me with confidence that
>> these patches have been sufficiently tested.
>>
>> I'll consider the cleanup batch if you can assure me that it
>> doesn't contain bugs similar to the "lost POSTROUTING chain"
>> problem contained in the last series that should have been
>> noticed with just some basic testing.
> 
> They have had their testing, and the error had been caught too
> by Changli merely by reading the patch:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=125732159605634&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=125733769630550&w=2
> 
> I still have blob 685400 in my working copy, though it seems unreachable 
> at this time, which means it sometime got lost in a rebase.

OK fair enough, I'll have another look once I'm finished with
my current work.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-24 14:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-24 10:18 Inclusion inquiry about remaining patches Jan Engelhardt
2010-02-24 12:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-02-24 14:48   ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-02-24 14:57     ` Patrick McHardy

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).