From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: ip_tables: foreachs and reentrancy Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:09:39 +0100 Message-ID: <4B865A73.8020804@trash.net> References: <1265970044-19518-1-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> <4B856498.9040202@trash.net> <4B864FC4.3000201@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:64250 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758862Ab0BYLJk (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:09:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Thursday 2010-02-25 11:24, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>> My intention was to have the entire set merged by 2.6.32, only >>> delayed by my own tinkering around with the get_cycle measurement of >>> the data collapse. But it was ready on-time for the 2.6.34 window! >>> What went wrong? Do we need to begin the merge-into-kabernext window >>> much earlier? >> Yes, you should begin submitting patches when net-next opens, >> usually at -rc1. > > Thanks for clearing this point of doubt up - I was under the > impression that submissions were only accepted when kaber-next > opens. It opens when submissions show up :)