From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amos Jeffries Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] TProxy IPv6 support 2nd round Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:10:32 +1300 Message-ID: <4B9CC428.6060209@treenet.co.nz> References: <1253548300.12519.20.camel@bzorp.balabit> <20091025101612.GS29852@prithivi.gnumonks.org> <1256547636.11361.18.camel@bzorp.balabit> <4B94C57A.5010605@treenet.co.nz> <1268557230.16066.20.camel@bzorp.balabit> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Welte , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Balazs Scheidler Return-path: Received: from ip-58-28-153-233.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz ([58.28.153.233]:45061 "EHLO treenet.co.nz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753083Ab0CNLKp (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:10:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1268557230.16066.20.camel@bzorp.balabit> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Balazs Scheidler wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 22:38 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> Balazs Scheidler wrote: >>> On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 11:16 +0100, Harald Welte wrote: >>>> Dear Balazs, >>>> >>>> as you might have read from other mails (and by the long period of silence), >>>> Patrick McHardy is currently unavailable to perform his usual maintainer >>>> role. >>>> >>>> I personally am too much out of touch with recent developments in >>>> netfitler-land to be able to confidently review your patches... >>>> >>>> So unless somebody else from the team (Jozsef?, Pablo?) feels confident in >>>> ACKing your patchset, I will have to ask for your patience until Patrick is >>>> back and can do it by himself. >>> Thanks for letting me know, hopefully Patrick gets better soon. I've >>> planned another round of the TProxy patches as I got some comments at >>> the previous round I'm yet to address. >>> >>> So no need to hurry. >>> >> Just bumping this topic up again. >> >> What is the current status of these patches? >> >> Our release which might make use of them goes into production sites in a >> few weeks and I'm starting to see a little more interest in them from >> our users. > > Well, no news ever since. I was backlogged with other stuff, so didn't > push these too much. All I got was two comments to be fixed: > > 1) indentation should use tabs instead of spaces > > 2) the IPv6 address detection should be changed to use a function > instead of relying on the first IPv6 address on the interface. > > Hopefully I can give this some care in the coming weeks. > Thank you for that. AYJ