netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_TEE
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:58:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA7A1C8.8050402@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1003200252060.762@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Wednesday 2010-03-17 14:35, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Normally, we would just use ip_local_out. Because iph->check is
>>> +	 * already correct, we could take a shortcut and call dst_output
>>> +	 * [forwards to ip_output] directly. ip_output however will invoke
>>> +	 * Netfilter hooks
>>>       
> [ok we can skip these with IPSKB_REROUTED]
>
>   
>>>         and cause reentrancy. So we skip that too and go
>>> +	 * directly to ip_finish_output.
>>>       
>
> And since we don't want fragmentation, we would need to call
> ip_finish_output2. That function is not exported, so it is copied. I
> am not even sure what the IPv4 layer does when it has to fragment a
> fragment (because fragments don't seem to carry IP_DF).
>   

I guess whether someone wants fragmentation is a question of the specific
use case. In many possible cases conntrack might have defragmented the
packet previously to reaching TEE, so it might actually be necessary to
refragment the packet.
> Setting IP_DF on the cloned skb could possibly lead to a Packet Too
> Big being sent back to the original sender - which should probably be
> avoided too.
>   

Indeed. This might also happen if the packet is passed through another
router of course.
>
> So removing the copied code does not look that easy.
>   
Well, worst case export the original function in case of duplicating it.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-22 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-17 13:18 nf-next: checks and three modules Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:18 ` [PATCH 1/9] netfilter: xtables: do without explicit XT_ALIGN Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:18 ` [PATCH 2/9] netfilter: xtables: slightly more detailed checkentry return values Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:39   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 14:05     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 14:16       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 14:27         ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 14:36           ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 14:40             ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 21:54               ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-18 11:14                 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:18 ` [PATCH 3/9] netfilter: xtables: restrict TCPMSS to mangle table as intended Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:30   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:34     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:36       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] netfilter: xtables: clean up xt_mac match routine Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:19 ` [PATCH 5/9] netfilter: xtables: limit xt_mac to ethernet devices Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:31   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:37     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:40       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:19 ` [PATCH 6/9] netfilter: xtables: resort osf kconfig text Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:19 ` [PATCH 7/9] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_SYSRQ Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:56   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 14:11     ` John Haxby
2010-03-17 14:43       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-20  1:47         ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-22 15:14           ` John Haxby
2010-03-22 16:49             ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 14:21     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 14:24       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:19 ` [PATCH 8/9] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_TEE Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:35   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:43     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:55       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-23  1:55         ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-23 11:57           ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-26  2:39           ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-20  2:03     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-22 16:58       ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2010-03-22 17:45         ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-23 12:04           ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-23 12:29             ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-23 12:38               ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-23 12:46                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-23 13:45                   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:19 ` [PATCH 9/9] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_condition Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BA7A1C8.8050402@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).