From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/7 v2]IPv6:netfilter: defragment Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:05:19 +0100 Message-ID: <4BA8D8AF.1040307@trash.net> References: <4B88BE30.80206@cn.fujitsu.com> <4B97D34C.4020509@gmail.com> <4B98B4FC.50904@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki , David Miller , Alexey Dobriyan , Yasuyuki KOZAKAI , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, "yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org >> YOSHIFUJI Hideaki" To: Shan Wei Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:59765 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754397Ab0CWPFU (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:05:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4B98B4FC.50904@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Shan Wei wrote: >> On the other hand, I'd even say we should NOT send >> icmp here (at least by default) because standard routers >> never send such packet. >> =20 > > Yes=EF=BC=8Cfor routers, the patch-set does not send icmp message to > source host. It only does on destination host with IPv6 connection=20 > track enable. > =20 The nf-next tree is open again, now would be a good time to resubmit these patches. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html