From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shan Wei Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/7 v2]IPv6:netfilter: defragment Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:28:20 +0800 Message-ID: <4BAACA44.6010306@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <4B88BE30.80206@cn.fujitsu.com> <4B97D34C.4020509@gmail.com> <4B98B4FC.50904@cn.fujitsu.com> <4BA8D8AF.1040307@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki , David Miller , Alexey Dobriyan , Yasuyuki KOZAKAI , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, "yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org >> YOSHIFUJI Hideaki" To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:61387 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753083Ab0CYC3I convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:29:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BA8D8AF.1040307@trash.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Patrick McHardy wrote, at 03/23/2010 11:05 PM: > Shan Wei wrote: >>> On the other hand, I'd even say we should NOT send >>> icmp here (at least by default) because standard routers >>> never send such packet. >>> =20 >> Yes=EF=BC=8Cfor routers, the patch-set does not send icmp message to >> source host. It only does on destination host with IPv6 connection=20 >> track enable. >> =20 >=20 > The nf-next tree is open again, now would be a good time to resubmit > these patches. > Thanks! If no body opposes them, i will resubmit these patches with v3.=20 --=20 Best Regards ----- Shan Wei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html