From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/7 v2]IPv6:netfilter: defragment Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:19:49 +0900 Message-ID: <4BAAE465.1070803@linux-ipv6.org> References: <4B88BE30.80206@cn.fujitsu.com> <4B97D34C.4020509@gmail.com> <4B98B4FC.50904@cn.fujitsu.com> <4BA8D8AF.1040307@trash.net> <4BAACA44.6010306@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Patrick McHardy , YOSHIFUJI Hideaki , David Miller , Alexey Dobriyan , Yasuyuki KOZAKAI , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki To: Shan Wei Return-path: Received: from 94.43.138.210.xn.2iij.net ([210.138.43.94]:41752 "EHLO mail.st-paulia.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750774Ab0CYEU1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:20:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BAACA44.6010306@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: (2010/03/25 11:28), Shan Wei wrote: > Patrick McHardy wrote, at 03/23/2010 11:05 PM: >> Shan Wei wrote: >>>> On the other hand, I'd even say we should NOT send >>>> icmp here (at least by default) because standard routers >>>> never send such packet. >>>> >>> Yes=EF=BC=8Cfor routers, the patch-set does not send icmp message t= o >>> source host. It only does on destination host with IPv6 connection >>> track enable. >>> >> >> The nf-next tree is open again, now would be a good time to resubmit >> these patches. >> Thanks! > > If no body opposes them, i will resubmit these patches with v3. > I still disagree 4-7. --yoshfuji -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html