From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] netfilter: xtables2: make ip_tables reentrant
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:29:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC463AF.1000106@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1004131342040.21259@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Tuesday 2010-04-13 13:15, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Developers can change it in the source code. Please remove the
>> parameter and hard code it.
>>
>> I'll then apply this patch if we can get rid of the ruleset
>> duplication for each CPU.
>
> The following changes since commit e26c28e8bffe12b27df5b828404afed9e1949191:
> Bart De Schuymer (1):
> netfilter: bridge-netfilter: update a comment in br_forward.c about ip_fragment()
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://dev.medozas.de/linux master
>
> Jan Engelhardt (6):
> netfilter: ipv6: move POSTROUTING invocation before fragmentation
> netfilter: ipv6: add IPSKB_REROUTED exclusion to NF_HOOK/POSTROUTING invocation
> netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_TEE
> netfilter: xtables2: make ip_tables reentrant
> netfilter: xt_TEE: have cloned packet travel through Xtables too
> netfilter: xtables: remove old comments about reentrancy
Again, please repost patches on updates. I want to see what I'm
applying/pulling.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-13 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-07 18:50 nf-next: TEE/reentrancy 20100407 Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-07 18:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] netfilter: ipv6: move POSTROUTING invocation before fragmentation Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-07 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] netfilter: ipv6: add IPSKB_REROUTED exclusion to NF_HOOK/POSTROUTING invocation Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-07 18:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_TEE Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-07 18:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] netfilter: xtables2: make ip_tables reentrant Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 9:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-13 10:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 10:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-13 11:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 11:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-13 11:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 12:29 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2010-04-07 18:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] netfilter: xt_TEE: have cloned packet travel through Xtables too Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 10:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-13 10:51 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 10:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-13 12:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-07 18:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] netfilter: xtables: remove old comments about reentrancy Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-09 9:39 ` nf-next: TEE/reentrancy 20100407 Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-09 14:53 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BC463AF.1000106@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).