From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: mmotm 2010-04-28 - RCU whinges
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 17:40:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE8290A.2080707@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100502.225509.233880079.davem@davemloft.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 897 bytes --]
David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 07:43:56 +0200
>
>> Le lundi 03 mai 2010 à 07:41 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>>
>>> Oops scratch that, I'll resend a correct version.
>>>
>>>
>> Sorry, patch _is_ fine, I had one brain collapse when re-reading it, I
>> thought a different mutex was in use in one of the functions.
>
> Ok, Patrick please review, thanks.
Actually we don't need the rcu_dereference() calls at all since
registration and unregistration are protected by the mutexes.
I queued this patch in nf-next, the only reason why I haven't
submitted it yet is that I was unable to get git to cleanly export
only the proper set of patches meant for -next due to a few merges,
it insists on including 5 patches already merged upstream. If you
don't mind ignoring the first 5 patches in the series, I'll send a
pull request tonight.
[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3840 bytes --]
commit ed86308f6179d8fa6151c2d0f652aad0091548e2
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Date: Fri Apr 9 16:42:15 2010 +0200
netfilter: remove invalid rcu_dereference() calls
The CONFIG_PROVE_RCU option discovered a few invalid uses of
rcu_dereference() in netfilter. In all these cases, the code code
intends to check whether a pointer is already assigned when
performing registration or whether the assigned pointer matches
when performing unregistration. The entire registration/
unregistration is protected by a mutex, so we don't need the
rcu_dereference() calls.
Reported-by: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Tested-by: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c
index d5a9bcd..849614a 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c
@@ -81,11 +81,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_ct_deliver_cached_events);
int nf_conntrack_register_notifier(struct nf_ct_event_notifier *new)
{
int ret = 0;
- struct nf_ct_event_notifier *notify;
mutex_lock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
- notify = rcu_dereference(nf_conntrack_event_cb);
- if (notify != NULL) {
+ if (nf_conntrack_event_cb != NULL) {
ret = -EBUSY;
goto out_unlock;
}
@@ -101,11 +99,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_register_notifier);
void nf_conntrack_unregister_notifier(struct nf_ct_event_notifier *new)
{
- struct nf_ct_event_notifier *notify;
-
mutex_lock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
- notify = rcu_dereference(nf_conntrack_event_cb);
- BUG_ON(notify != new);
+ BUG_ON(nf_conntrack_event_cb != new);
rcu_assign_pointer(nf_conntrack_event_cb, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
}
@@ -114,11 +109,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_unregister_notifier);
int nf_ct_expect_register_notifier(struct nf_exp_event_notifier *new)
{
int ret = 0;
- struct nf_exp_event_notifier *notify;
mutex_lock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
- notify = rcu_dereference(nf_expect_event_cb);
- if (notify != NULL) {
+ if (nf_expect_event_cb != NULL) {
ret = -EBUSY;
goto out_unlock;
}
@@ -134,11 +127,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_ct_expect_register_notifier);
void nf_ct_expect_unregister_notifier(struct nf_exp_event_notifier *new)
{
- struct nf_exp_event_notifier *notify;
-
mutex_lock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
- notify = rcu_dereference(nf_expect_event_cb);
- BUG_ON(notify != new);
+ BUG_ON(nf_expect_event_cb != new);
rcu_assign_pointer(nf_expect_event_cb, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
}
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_log.c b/net/netfilter/nf_log.c
index 015725a..908f599 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_log.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_log.c
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ static struct nf_logger *__find_logger(int pf, const char *str_logger)
/* return EEXIST if the same logger is registred, 0 on success. */
int nf_log_register(u_int8_t pf, struct nf_logger *logger)
{
- const struct nf_logger *llog;
int i;
if (pf >= ARRAY_SIZE(nf_loggers))
@@ -52,8 +51,7 @@ int nf_log_register(u_int8_t pf, struct nf_logger *logger)
} else {
/* register at end of list to honor first register win */
list_add_tail(&logger->list[pf], &nf_loggers_l[pf]);
- llog = rcu_dereference(nf_loggers[pf]);
- if (llog == NULL)
+ if (nf_loggers[pf] == NULL)
rcu_assign_pointer(nf_loggers[pf], logger);
}
@@ -65,13 +63,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_log_register);
void nf_log_unregister(struct nf_logger *logger)
{
- const struct nf_logger *c_logger;
int i;
mutex_lock(&nf_log_mutex);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(nf_loggers); i++) {
- c_logger = rcu_dereference(nf_loggers[i]);
- if (c_logger == logger)
+ if (nf_loggers[i] == logger)
rcu_assign_pointer(nf_loggers[i], NULL);
list_del(&logger->list[i]);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-10 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201004290021.o3T0L04Y028017@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
2010-05-02 17:46 ` mmotm 2010-04-28 - RCU whinges Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-05-03 5:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 5:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 5:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 5:55 ` David Miller
2010-05-10 15:40 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2010-05-10 15:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-10 15:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-10 16:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-05-10 16:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-05-10 15:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-10 16:12 ` David Miller
2010-05-10 16:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-05-03 14:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-05-03 14:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 14:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 15:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-05-03 15:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-03 16:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 18:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-03 19:46 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: if6_get_next() fix Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 20:09 ` David Miller
2010-05-03 20:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 20:24 ` David Miller
2010-05-03 20:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 22:17 ` David Miller
2010-05-03 22:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-03 22:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-03 22:54 ` David Miller
2010-05-10 16:53 ` mmotm 2010-04-28 - RCU whinges Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE8290A.2080707@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).