From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:16:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C0FA24A.7060907@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100607145558.GA1939@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:03:17PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to be able to sendout a single IP packet with MF flag set.
>>>
>>> When using RAW sockets the packet will get stuck in the
>>> netfilter (NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT nf_defrag_ipv4 reassembly unit)
>>> and wont ever make it out..
>>>
>>> I made a change which bypass the outgoing reassembly for
>>> RAW sockets, but I'm not sure wether it's too invasive..
>>>
>> That would break reassembly (and thus connection tracking) for cases
>> where its really intended.
>>
>>
>>> Is there any standard for RAW sockets behaviour?
>>> Or another way around? :)
>>>
>> You could use the NOTRACK target to bypass connection tracking.
>>
>
> ok,
>
> I tried the NOTRACK target, but the packet is still going
> throught reassembly, because the RAW filter has lower priority
> then the connection track defragmentation..
>
Right.
> I was able to get it bypassed by attached patch and following
> command:
>
> iptables -v -t raw -A OUTPUT -p icmp -j NOTRACK
>
> again, not sure if this is too invasive ;)
>
Well, we can't change it in the mainline kernel.
> If this is not the way, I'd appreciatte any hint.. my goal is
> to put malformed packet on the wire (more frags bit set for a
> non fragmented packet)
I don't have any good suggestions besides adding a flag to the IPCB
and skipping defragmentation based on that.
next parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-09 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100604112708.GA1958@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4C08EB85.3050900@trash.net>
[not found] ` <20100607145558.GA1939@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
2010-06-09 14:16 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2010-06-09 15:15 ` no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket Jan Engelhardt
2010-06-09 15:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-09 15:20 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-06-10 6:57 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-10 6:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-10 9:14 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-10 9:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-10 10:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-11 8:16 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-11 9:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-06-11 13:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-15 6:53 ` [PATCH] net: IP_NODEFRAG option for IPv4 socket Jiri Olsa
2010-06-15 7:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-15 9:18 ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-15 9:49 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C0FA24A.7060907@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).