From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: ip_conntrack fails to track Windows Vista TCP connection Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:23:01 +0200 Message-ID: <4C16E405.40705@trash.net> References: <0199E0D51A61344794750DC57738F58E70B258E2B3@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net> <4C165596.8020700@trash.net> <0199E0D51A61344794750DC57738F58E70B258E346@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Engelhardt , "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" To: "Fischer, Anna" Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:62609 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754806Ab0FOCXG (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:23:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <0199E0D51A61344794750DC57738F58E70B258E346@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Fischer, Anna wrote: >>> You're mentioning ip_conntrack, which is obsoleted for multiple >>> years now. Which kernel version are you using? >>> >> By definition of ip_conntrack, that must be older than 2.6.20. >> > > Yes, this is a 2.6.18 Xen kernel that I am using. Even if it is obsolete, can you let me know if you are aware of such a problem ever having caused any issues? I just want to get a feeling if I am at least roughly on the right track while figuring out what the problem is. > We've had a couple of problems related to related to acknowledgement numbers in TCP conntrack, I'd suggest you check the nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c changelogs, basically everything in there should also apply to the old version.