From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: ip_conntrack fails to track Windows Vista TCP connection Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:20:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4C17A86A.20806@trash.net> References: <0199E0D51A61344794750DC57738F58E70B258E2B3@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net> <4C165596.8020700@trash.net> <0199E0D51A61344794750DC57738F58E70B258E346@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net> <4C16E405.40705@trash.net> <0199E0D51A61344794750DC57738F58E70B258E939@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net> <4C17A843.2070905@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Engelhardt , "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" To: "Fischer, Anna" Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:43000 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756934Ab0FOQU7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:20:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C17A843.2070905@trash.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Patrick McHardy wrote: > Fischer, Anna wrote: >>> >>> We've had a couple of problems related to related to >>> acknowledgement numbers in TCP conntrack, I'd suggest >>> you check the nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c changelogs, >>> basically everything in there should also apply to >>> the old version. >>> >> >> Thanks for your advice. Why would the problem be in >> nf_conntrack_proto_tcp and not in ip_conntrack_proto_tcp? >> > > Its not of course, but nf_conntrack_proto_tcp is derived from > ip_conntrack_proto_tcp, > all the bugfixes also apply to ip_conntrack_proto_tcp. By which I mean all the bugfixes contained in the current kernel.