From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [patch v2.3 3/4] IPVS: make FTP work with full NAT support Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:43:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4C3316F0.2030807@trash.net> References: <20100704113246.562399500@vergenet.net> <20100704114808.932594876@vergenet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Malcolm Turnbull , Wensong Zhang , Julius Volz , "David S. Miller" , Hannes Eder To: Simon Horman Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:65085 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755009Ab0GFLno (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 07:43:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100704114808.932594876@vergenet.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Simon Horman wrote: > @@ -219,19 +358,23 @@ static int ip_vs_ftp_out(struct ip_vs_ap > > buf_len = strlen(buf); > > + ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo); > + ret = nf_nat_mangle_tcp_packet(skb, > + ct, > + ctinfo, > + start-data, > + end-start, > + buf, > + buf_len); > + > + if (ct && ct != &nf_conntrack_untracked) > This does not make sense, you're already using the conntrack above in the call to nf_nat_mangle_tcp_packet(), so the check should probably happen before that. You also should be checking the return value of nf_nat_mangle_tcp_packet() before setting up the expectation. > + ip_vs_expect_related(skb, ct, n_cp, > + IPPROTO_TCP, NULL, 0);