From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] netfilter: ctnetlink: add support for user-space expectation helpers
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:45:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C99A614.1030207@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C9933F1.2060200@netfilter.org>
Am 22.09.2010 00:38, schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso:
>>
>> My main question is - what will be cleaning up these expectations
>> on module unload? Currently expectations are cleaned up on unload
>> of the corresponding helper module, which obviously doesn't
>> happen in this case.
>
> Indeed. I have reworked the patch to add the nf_ct_userspace_expect_list
> that is used to delete all the user-space created expectations if
> ctnetlink is unloaded.
> diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h b/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> index fdc50ca..23a1a08 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ enum ip_conntrack_expect_events {
> /* expectation flags */
> #define NF_CT_EXPECT_PERMANENT 0x1
> #define NF_CT_EXPECT_INACTIVE 0x2
> +#define NF_CT_EXPECT_USERSPACE 0x4
Does this flag need to be exposed to userspace? I also don't
see anything preventing userspace incorrectly setting it on
an expectation that actually does have a master, which will
probably cause problems later on.
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
> index acb29cc..361a8ba 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
> @@ -38,20 +38,26 @@ static int nf_ct_expect_hash_rnd_initted __read_mostly;
>
> static struct kmem_cache *nf_ct_expect_cachep __read_mostly;
>
> +static HLIST_HEAD(nf_ct_userspace_expect_list);
> +static int nf_ct_userspace_expect_list_counter;
This counter is write-only.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-22 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-21 9:34 [PATCH 0/4] We all need more expectations Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-09-21 9:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] netfilter: nf_nat: better error handling of nf_ct_expect_related() in helpers Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-09-21 15:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-09-22 6:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-09-21 9:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] netfilter: ctnetlink: missing validation of CTA_EXPECT_ZONE attribute Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-09-22 6:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-09-21 9:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] netfilter: ctnetlink: allow to specify the expectation flags Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-09-21 15:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-09-21 22:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-09-22 6:37 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-09-21 9:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] netfilter: ctnetlink: add support for user-space expectation helpers Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-09-21 15:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-09-21 22:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-09-22 6:45 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2010-09-22 11:07 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-09-28 19:08 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C99A614.1030207@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).