netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mr Dash Four <mr.dash.four@googlemail.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xtables does not reconise ipportiphash/ipportnethash sets
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 01:30:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C9A9FAF.8090804@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1009230206250.9682@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>


> You willingly chose to use Redhat/Fedora. Now endure the pain! :-)
>   
I just wished I hadn't! 5 minutes ago I found yet ANOTHER bug - this 
time in selinux-policy - the SELinux context on all iptables executables 
is set wrong simply because whoever wrote the policy choose the wrong 
location of these files - in FC13 they are all installed in /sbin, but 
iptables.fc says /usr/sbin so the context is not set. Lovely stuff!

>> Since the 2 kmod-* and xtabbles-addons rpms do not recognise the custom-built
>> string after the kernel version -
>>     
>
> Sounds like another Fedora problem. I know it works in openSUSE,
> but that is probably because they make sure the custom string is
> actually _in_ the version (as evidenced by `uname -r`).
>   
So is on FC13 - I just checked and it is displayed - version + custom 
string. The problem is that the scripts are actually looking for the 
kernel numbers, ASSUMING there is nothing after it. How daft is that?


> Yes, someone made a big boo and furthermore did not send the fix to
> -stable (actually I don't know that), but what I know is that it
> did not appear in -stable yet. And then there is that 2.6.34 is
> no longer maintained. Let alone distros mostly don't even think
> about updating. So everybody using linux-glibc-devel-2.6.34
> (that is the userspace package providing /usr/include/linux) is
> screwed.
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325257
>   
I just found that out to my cost - need to download the patch, update my 
source and rebuild the kernel again, then rinse, repeat with xtables and 
hope that it works.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-23  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-22 19:19 xtables does not reconise ipportiphash/ipportnethash sets Mr Dash Four
2010-09-22 20:27 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-22 23:23   ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23  0:03     ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23  0:18     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23  0:30       ` Mr Dash Four [this message]
2010-09-23  0:55         ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23  1:01           ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23 10:28             ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23 10:48               ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23 10:57                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23 11:21                   ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23 12:16                     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23 12:21                       ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23 12:24                         ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23 12:31                           ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-23 12:49                           ` Mr Dash Four

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C9A9FAF.8090804@googlemail.com \
    --to=mr.dash.four@googlemail.com \
    --cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).