From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
sds@tycho.nsa.gov, jengelh@medozas.de, paul.moore@hp.com,
casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter@vger.kernel.org, mr.dash.four@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] secmark: export binary yes/no rather than kernel internal secid
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:41:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C9DB5CE.7090305@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100924204531.28355.20320.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com>
On 24/09/10 22:45, Eric Paris wrote:
> Currently the nfconntrack export code sends the kernel internal secid to
> userspace in a couple of proc files and over netlink as an integer. This
> is wrong. This number is a kernel internal. This patch changes the export
> code to output either 0 or 1 for this value. A future patch will implement
> sending the name rather than the number in a new field.
I'm not sure why you need this transitional patch if you later on
replace it.
Better to change the /proc output to make it consistent with patch 5/6?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-25 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-24 20:45 [PATCH 1/6] secmark: do not return early if there was no error Eric Paris
2010-09-24 20:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] secmark: make secmark object handling generic Eric Paris
2010-09-25 8:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-09-27 16:47 ` Eric Paris
2010-09-24 20:45 ` [PATCH 3/6] secmark: export binary yes/no rather than kernel internal secid Eric Paris
2010-09-25 8:41 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2010-09-27 16:44 ` Eric Paris
2010-09-27 0:50 ` James Morris
2010-09-27 17:01 ` Eric Paris
2010-09-27 18:29 ` Paul Moore
2010-09-27 19:25 ` Eric Paris
2010-09-27 19:45 ` Paul Moore
2010-09-27 22:48 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-09-28 0:00 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-28 8:45 ` Mr Dash Four
2010-09-27 23:45 ` James Morris
2010-09-28 12:32 ` Casey Schaufler
2010-09-24 20:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] security: secid_to_secctx returns len when data is NULL Eric Paris
2010-09-27 13:49 ` Casey Schaufler
2010-09-24 20:45 ` [PATCH 5/6] conntrack: export lsm context rather than internal secid via netlink Eric Paris
2010-09-24 21:08 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-27 11:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-09-27 16:51 ` Eric Paris
2010-09-24 20:45 ` [PATCH 6/6] secmark: export secctx, drop secmark in procfs Eric Paris
2010-09-24 21:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] secmark: do not return early if there was no error Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C9DB5CE.7090305@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mr.dash.four@googlemail.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).