From: Mr Dash Four <mr.dash.four@googlemail.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: event-driven connection tracking
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:26:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB704F7.60608@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CB6F1E2.3030702@netfilter.org>
>>>> conntrack -Ee NEW,DESTROY
>>>>
>>>> would list you the specified events as they happen. Combined with a script
>>>> that reacts when a new line is outputted by conntrack should
>>>> do the trick.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That's not what I am after!
>>>
>>> If I want to poll a text output every-so-often I can use /proc/net/nf_conntrack
>>>
>> -E is event driven. (That's why it's got the "E".)
>>
>
> Indeed, if you're looking for a tool to listen to event-driven conntrack
> notifications, then what Jan suggests is the correct approach. If you
> want to make your own handling application, you can use
> libnetfilter_conntrack.
>
Making my own handling application was the preferred way, though I would
have settled for text-based notifications through the stdin pipe (a bit
clumsy, but doable). As it turns out libnetfilter_conntrack seems to
provide me with what I need, so I would settle for that.
Another constraint I have (which I did not mention in my initial post)
is that, for various reasons, I am using the 2.6.16.60 kernel - the
libnetfilter_conntrack requirements suggest I can get away with it, is
there anything in particular I should be aware of when installing/using
this package with this kernel version (no, I am not in a position to
upgrade - not yet!)?
> For logging, you can use ulogd2.
>
I have been doing the logging and it is not what I need as the 'action'
I take depends on what I find in the event matches - sometimes it is
necessary to just log the necessary data, but sometimes I would need to
initiate process scanning and full packet dumps on a particular
connection - for that to just use logging won't be enough.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-14 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-13 15:24 event-driven connection tracking Mr Dash Four
2010-10-13 15:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-10-13 22:18 ` Mr Dash Four
2010-10-13 22:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-10-14 12:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-10-14 13:26 ` Mr Dash Four [this message]
2010-10-15 7:17 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-10-14 12:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-10-14 13:14 ` Mr Dash Four
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CB704F7.60608@googlemail.com \
--to=mr.dash.four@googlemail.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).