From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] secmark: make secmark object handling generic Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:18:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4CB870D9.6020703@trash.net> References: <20101013202441.15272.75924.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, jengelh@medozas.de, paul.moore@hp.com, jmorris@namei.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, pablo@netfilter.org To: Eric Paris Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:51195 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756300Ab0JOPTR (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:19:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20101013202441.15272.75924.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 13.10.2010 22:24, schrieb Eric Paris: > Right now secmark has lots of direct selinux calls. Use all LSM calls and > remove all SELinux specific knowledge. The only SELinux specific knowledge > we leave is the mode. The only point is to make sure that other LSMs at > least test this generic code before they assume it works. (They may also > have to make changes if they do not represent labels as strings) > > Signed-off-by: Eric Paris > Acked-by: Paul Moore I think these patches should go through the security tree. Acked-by: Patrick McHardy