From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] secmark: export secctx, drop secmark in procfs Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:22:55 +0200 Message-ID: <4CB871CF.8040607@trash.net> References: <20101013202441.15272.75924.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> <20101013202500.15272.92369.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, jengelh@medozas.de, paul.moore@hp.com, jmorris@namei.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, pablo@netfilter.org To: Eric Paris Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:51267 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756036Ab0JOPW6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:22:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20101013202500.15272.92369.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 13.10.2010 22:25, schrieb Eric Paris: > The current secmark code exports a secmark= field which just indicates if > there is special labeling on a packet or not. We drop this field as it > isn't particularly useful and instead export a new field secctx= which is > the actual human readable text label. We usually don't do this to avoid breaking parsers, however in this case the field was dependant on a config option anyways, so userspace must already be prepared that it is missing. Acked-by: Patrick McHardy