netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mr Dash Four <mr.dash.four@googlemail.com>
To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipset-5.0 released
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:52:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0E0E2A.3090604@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012190105460.11753@blackhole.kfki.hu>


>> By 'something' I mean either omission of the protocol, or 'all' to be
>> specified instead of the protocol to mean no matching on protocol would be
>> made (in other words the protocol to be disregarded). This will be especially
>> useful for sets with quite a few number of members and will avoid unnecessary
>> duplication - as things stand I have to add the same number of members for
>> both tcp and udp protocols when I don't need any protocol matching - just the
>> subnets and port numbers I specified. Is this doable?
>>     
>
> Use set types without port sub-part, like hash:net or hash:ip, etc.
> I don't really see why you would want to use a type with port and then 
> ignore it.
>   
I don't want to ignore the port - that stays (I need it to do the 
matching). I want to ignore the protocol, but keep the subnet and port 
number matches.

As I already mentioned, I see the need to register 2x as many members to 
a particular set just to get the match required (i.e. ignore the 
protocol) unnecessary when the alternative is to a) do not use protocol 
definition; or b) use another word (I suggested 'all') to ignore the 
protocol match and just use the subnet and port number(s) instead.

Wouldn't you agree that this is a better solution than registering twice 
as many members in a particular set in order to get the match I need?


  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-19 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-17 22:26 [ANNOUNCE] ipset-5.0 released Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-17 23:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-12-18 10:40   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-18  7:29 ` Rob Sterenborg (lists)
2010-12-18 11:13   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-18 15:43     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-12-18 19:50       ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-18 21:49         ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-12-19  0:05           ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-19  0:28             ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-12-19  5:56           ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-12-19 18:23     ` Rob Sterenborg (lists)
2010-12-21 11:14     ` Rob Sterenborg (lists)
2010-12-21 14:03       ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-18 14:22 ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-18 20:23   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-18 21:51     ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-18 22:10       ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-12-18 22:23         ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-19  0:34       ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-19 13:52         ` Mr Dash Four [this message]
2010-12-19 15:20           ` Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
2010-12-19 17:04             ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-22 10:59               ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-22 12:48                 ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-23 15:39                   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-23 17:50                     ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-23 17:55                       ` David Miller
2010-12-23 18:00                         ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-23 18:06                           ` David Miller
2010-12-23 18:10                             ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-23 19:35                       ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-23 22:23                         ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-23 22:46                           ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-23 22:56                             ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-23 23:06                               ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-26 10:30                                 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-26 13:47                                   ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-26 20:09                                     ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-26 21:44                                       ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-27 14:49                                         ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-27 16:23                                           ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-27 18:20                                             ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-27 18:52                                               ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-28 19:26                                                 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-23 23:03                             ` Mr Dash Four
2010-12-26 10:32                               ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-12-23 21:51                       ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D0E0E2A.3090604@googlemail.com \
    --to=mr.dash.four@googlemail.com \
    --cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).