From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Clark Subject: inconsistent address treatment. Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:12:16 -0500 Message-ID: <4D1358C0.4060704@earthlink.net> Reply-To: sclark46@earthlink.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.67]:60244 "EHLO elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751704Ab0LWOMR (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:12:17 -0500 Received: from [69.22.83.66] (helo=joker.seclark.com) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1PVltx-0004ld-ET for netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:12:17 -0500 Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, Why the inconsistency in the way addresses are treated. I can use -d 2.2.2.2/32 but not --to-source 205.201.149.214/32 iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -s 10.0.128.0/17 -d 2.2.2.2/32 -j SNAT --to-source 205.201.149.214/32 -- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin) "The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)