From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: return error number to caller
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:56:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D2DF944.8060407@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1293407904-31464-3-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de>
Hi Florian,
I've got some questions and comments on this patchset, please see below.
On 27/12/10 00:58, Florian Westphal wrote:
> instead of returning -1 on error, return an error number to allow the
> caller to handle some errors differently.
>
> To make things simpler try_module_get() failure is no longer special-cased.
>
> The new return values will be used in followup patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> ---
> net/netfilter/core.c | 5 +--
> net/netfilter/nf_queue.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c | 22 +++++++++++------
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
> index 32fcbe2..518a2e3 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
> @@ -179,9 +179,8 @@ next_hook:
> if (ret == 0)
> ret = -EPERM;
> } else if ((verdict & NF_VERDICT_MASK) == NF_QUEUE) {
> - if (!nf_queue(skb, elem, pf, hook, indev, outdev, okfn,
> - verdict >> NF_VERDICT_BITS))
> - goto next_hook;
> + nf_queue(skb, elem, pf, hook, indev, outdev, okfn,
> + verdict >> NF_VERDICT_BITS);
You have to remove the next_hook label if you want to do this.
It's not clear to me why we need to remove the goto jump, could you
clarify this?
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return ret;
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> index 74aebed..a417458 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static int __nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> int (*okfn)(struct sk_buff *),
> unsigned int queuenum)
> {
> - int status;
> + int error = -EINVAL;
Please, don't rename this variable unless that you have a good reason to
do so. Better keep the same name to reduce the number of lines that has
changed in this patch.
> struct nf_queue_entry *entry = NULL;
> #ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER
> struct net_device *physindev;
> @@ -136,8 +136,10 @@ static int __nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> goto err_unlock;
here above there's the following:
qh = rcu_dereference(queue_handler[pf]);
if (!qh)
goto err_unlock;
afinfo = nf_get_afinfo(pf);
if (!afinfo)
goto err_unlock;
With your patch, we're returning -EINVAL. I think it's better to return
-ENOENT.
> entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry) + afinfo->route_key_size, GFP_ATOMIC);
> - if (!entry)
> + if (!entry) {
> + error = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_unlock;
> + }
>
> *entry = (struct nf_queue_entry) {
> .skb = skb,
> @@ -149,12 +151,8 @@ static int __nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> .okfn = okfn,
> };
>
> - /* If it's going away, ignore hook. */
> - if (!try_module_get(entry->elem->owner)) {
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - kfree(entry);
> - return 0;
> - }
> + if (!try_module_get(entry->elem->owner))
> + goto err_unlock;
With this change, we're now releasing the skb, is this deliberate?
> /* Bump dev refs so they don't vanish while packet is out */
> if (indev)
> @@ -173,23 +171,23 @@ static int __nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> #endif
> skb_dst_force(skb);
> afinfo->saveroute(skb, entry);
> - status = qh->outfn(entry, queuenum);
> + error = qh->outfn(entry, queuenum);
>
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> - if (status < 0) {
> + if (error < 0) {
> nf_queue_entry_release_refs(entry);
> goto err;
> }
>
> - return 1;
> + return 0;
>
> err_unlock:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> err:
> kfree_skb(skb);
> kfree(entry);
> - return 1;
> + return error;
> }
>
> int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> @@ -201,6 +199,8 @@ int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> unsigned int queuenum)
> {
> struct sk_buff *segs;
> + int error = 0;
> + unsigned int queued;
>
> if (!skb_is_gso(skb))
> return __nf_queue(skb, elem, pf, hook, indev, outdev, okfn,
> @@ -218,18 +218,26 @@ int nf_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
> segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, 0);
> kfree_skb(skb);
> if (IS_ERR(segs))
> - return 1;
> + return -ENOMEM;
Better propagate the error of skb_gso_segment(...) with PTR_ERR()
> + queued = 0;
> do {
> struct sk_buff *nskb = segs->next;
>
> segs->next = NULL;
> - if (!__nf_queue(segs, elem, pf, hook, indev, outdev, okfn,
> - queuenum))
> - kfree_skb(segs);
> + if (error == 0) {
> + error = __nf_queue(segs, elem, pf, hook, indev,
> + outdev, okfn, queuenum);
> + if (error == 0)
> + queued++;
> + }
> + kfree_skb(segs);
Before this patch, segs were only released if try_module_get() failed.
Now it always release it?
> segs = nskb;
> } while (segs);
> - return 1;
> +
> + if (unlikely(error && queued))
> + error = 0;
> + return error;
> }
>
> void nf_reinject(struct nf_queue_entry *entry, unsigned int verdict)
> @@ -237,6 +245,7 @@ void nf_reinject(struct nf_queue_entry *entry, unsigned int verdict)
> struct sk_buff *skb = entry->skb;
> struct list_head *elem = &entry->elem->list;
> const struct nf_afinfo *afinfo;
> + int err;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
>
> @@ -270,10 +279,9 @@ void nf_reinject(struct nf_queue_entry *entry, unsigned int verdict)
> local_bh_enable();
> break;
> case NF_QUEUE:
> - if (!__nf_queue(skb, elem, entry->pf, entry->hook,
> - entry->indev, entry->outdev, entry->okfn,
> - verdict >> NF_VERDICT_BITS))
> - goto next_hook;
> + __nf_queue(skb, elem, entry->pf, entry->hook,
> + entry->indev, entry->outdev, entry->okfn,
> + verdict >> NF_VERDICT_BITS);
Again, the next_label was not removed.
> break;
> case NF_STOLEN:
> default:
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
> index 68e67d1..b83123f 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
> @@ -387,25 +387,31 @@ nfqnl_enqueue_packet(struct nf_queue_entry *entry, unsigned int queuenum)
> {
> struct sk_buff *nskb;
> struct nfqnl_instance *queue;
> - int err;
> + int err = -ENOBUFS;
>
> /* rcu_read_lock()ed by nf_hook_slow() */
> queue = instance_lookup(queuenum);
> - if (!queue)
> + if (!queue) {
> + err = -ESRCH;
> goto err_out;
> + }
>
> - if (queue->copy_mode == NFQNL_COPY_NONE)
> + if (queue->copy_mode == NFQNL_COPY_NONE) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> goto err_out;
> + }
>
> nskb = nfqnl_build_packet_message(queue, entry);
> - if (nskb == NULL)
> + if (nskb == NULL) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_out;
> -
> + }
> spin_lock_bh(&queue->lock);
>
> - if (!queue->peer_pid)
> + if (!queue->peer_pid) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> goto err_out_free_nskb;
> -
> + }
> if (queue->queue_total >= queue->queue_maxlen) {
> queue->queue_dropped++;
> if (net_ratelimit())
> @@ -432,7 +438,7 @@ err_out_free_nskb:
> err_out_unlock:
> spin_unlock_bh(&queue->lock);
> err_out:
> - return -1;
> + return err;
> }
>
> static int
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-12 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-26 23:58 [PATCH] NFQUEUE v2 target with 'queue bypass' support Florian Westphal
2010-12-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 1/6] netfilter: kconfig: NFQUEUE is useless without NETFILTER_NETLINK_QUEUE Florian Westphal
2010-12-27 8:41 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-12-27 8:47 ` Michał Mirosław
2010-12-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: return error number to caller Florian Westphal
2011-01-12 18:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2011-01-12 20:49 ` Florian Westphal
2011-01-12 21:59 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-13 0:14 ` Florian Westphal
2010-12-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 3/6] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: do not free skb on error Florian Westphal
2011-01-12 19:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-12 20:50 ` Florian Westphal
2010-12-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 4/6] netfilter: reduce NF_VERDICT_MASK to 0xff Florian Westphal
2011-01-12 19:02 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-12 20:52 ` Florian Westphal
2011-01-14 14:05 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-01-15 14:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-15 14:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-12-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 5/6] netfilter: allow NFQUEUE bypass if no listener is available Florian Westphal
2011-01-12 19:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-12-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 6/6] netfilter: do not omit re-route check on NF_QUEUE verdict Florian Westphal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-16 13:19 [PATCH v2] NFQUEUE v2 target with 'queue bypass' support Florian Westphal
2011-01-16 13:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: return error number to caller Florian Westphal
2011-01-18 14:27 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D2DF944.8060407@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).