From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ipt_CLUSTERIP: dont flood with "no conntrack!"
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:23:06 +0100
Message-ID: <4D2EE09A.1010409@netfilter.org>
References: <4D2E1A74.5080102@netfilter.org> <1294917210.3570.48.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:36103 "EHLO mail.us.es"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1756571Ab1AMLXL (ORCPT <rfc822;netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 13 Jan 2011 06:23:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1294917210.3570.48.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Eric,

On 13/01/11 12:13, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> ipt_CLUSTERIP users might hit this annoying printk, if they forgot an
> "iptables -I INPUT -m state --state INVALID -j DROP" before CLUSTERIP
> rule. We could use net_ratelimit() here, or not log the message at all.
> I chose to log it once per config.

I think that this should be converted to pr_debug() instead, there's
also another reference to "unknown protocol" that should be converted as
well.