From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] netfilter: ipt_CLUSTERIP: remove "no conntrack!"
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:30:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D2F28B9.50407@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1294929579.3570.163.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On 13/01/11 15:39, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le jeudi 13 janvier 2011 à 15:02 +0100, Jan Engelhardt a écrit :
>> On Thursday 2011-01-13 14:38, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>>> Le jeudi 13 janvier 2011 à 12:54 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso a écrit :
>>>
>>>> But printing this does not provide any useful information. The first
>>>> packet that does not belong to the cluster node that has received the
>>>> packet, or the first invalid packet, will trigger this.
>>>>
>>>> Moreover, this confuses users since they can do nothing if they receive
>>>> this message.
>>>>
>>>> Moreover, this target should be supersedes by the cluster match, which
>>>> has been there for quite some time (it's also more flexible).
>>>
>>> Now you mentioned it, cluster match is not as flexible right now,
>>> its hashing is on source_ip only.
>>
>> I think in that case, xt_cluster should be improved rather
>> than an old module.
>
> Amen
>
> We should not improve IPv4 support then, I see.
>
> My customers use this old module, and upgrading to xt_cluster is not an
> option.
>
> Should we discuss this forever or fix it ?
hey hey, I'm fine with fixing things. Patch v4 is OK.
Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> In the end, people are forced to add useless iptables rule to DROP
> INVALID packets before entering ipt_CLUSTERIP, after googling or
> eventually asking to experts.
>
> Last time this was discussed, this went nowhere :
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter/msg48676.html
>
> Come on guys, we can do it, dont be afraid.
>
> A non rate limited printk() in kernel is forbidden, especially in
> network stack.
>
> Then, cluster match can be improved, I am sure you already have a patch
> for it.
what scenario could benefit from the destination-based hashing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-13 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-12 21:17 netfilter tree for 2.6.38 is open Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-13 11:13 ` [PATCH] netfilter: ipt_CLUSTERIP: dont flood with "no conntrack!" Eric Dumazet
2011-01-13 11:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-13 11:28 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-01-13 11:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-13 11:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-13 11:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-13 11:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-13 13:38 ` [PATCH v4] netfilter: ipt_CLUSTERIP: remove " Eric Dumazet
2011-01-13 14:02 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-01-13 14:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-13 16:30 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2011-01-13 16:35 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-13 16:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-18 15:28 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D2F28B9.50407@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).