From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] netfilter: ipt_CLUSTERIP: remove "no conntrack!"
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:35:34 +0100
Message-ID: <4D2F29D6.3040600@netfilter.org>
References: <4D2E1A74.5080102@netfilter.org>	 <1294917210.3570.48.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4D2EE09A.1010409@netfilter.org>	 <1294918365.3570.56.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4D2EE80B.6010707@netfilter.org>	 <1294925915.3570.87.camel@edumazet-laptop>	 <alpine.LNX.2.01.1101131502240.25211@obet.zrqbmnf.qr> <1294929579.3570.163.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4D2F28B9.50407@netfilter.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
	Netfilter Development Mailinglist
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:40047 "EHLO mail.us.es"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1757064Ab1AMQfg (ORCPT <rfc822;netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:35:36 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4D2F28B9.50407@netfilter.org>
Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org>

On 13/01/11 17:30, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On 13/01/11 15:39, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Then, cluster match can be improved, I am sure you already have a patch
>> for it.
> 
> what scenario could benefit from the destination-based hashing?

I'm telling this because it doesn't make too sense to me.