From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fwestphal@astaro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] netfilter: allow NFQUEUE bypass if no listener is available
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:09:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D35AD29.2060400@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295183947-12786-6-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de>
On 16.01.2011 14:19, Florian Westphal wrote:
> If an skb is to be NF_QUEUE'd, but no program has opened the queue, the
> packet is dropped.
>
> This adds a v2 target revision of xt_NFQUEUE that allows packets to
> continue through the ruleset instead.
>
> Because the actual queueing happens outside of the target context, the
> 'bypass' flag has to be communicated back to the netfilter core.
>
> Unfortunately the only choice to do this without adding a new function
> argument is to use the target function return value (i.e. the verdict).
>
> In the NF_QUEUE case, the upper 16bit already contain the queue number
> to use. The previous patch reduced NF_VERDICT_MASK to 0xff, i.e.
> we now have extra room for a new flag.
>
> If a hook issued a NF_QUEUE verdict, then the netfilter core will
> continue packet processing if the queueing hook
> returns -ESRCH (== "this queue does not exist") and the new
> NF_VERDICT_FLAG_QUEUE_BYPASS flag is set in the verdict value.
>
> Note: If the queue exists, but userspace does not consume packets fast
> enough, the skb will still be dropped.
Applied, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-18 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-16 13:19 [PATCH v2] NFQUEUE v2 target with 'queue bypass' support Florian Westphal
2011-01-16 13:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] netfilter: kconfig: NFQUEUE is useless without NETFILTER_NETLINK_QUEUE Florian Westphal
2011-01-18 14:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-01-16 13:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: return error number to caller Florian Westphal
2011-01-18 14:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-01-16 13:19 ` [PATCH 3/6] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: do not free skb on error Florian Westphal
2011-01-18 14:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-01-16 13:19 ` [PATCH 4/6] netfilter: reduce NF_VERDICT_MASK to 0xff Florian Westphal
2011-01-18 14:52 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-01-16 13:19 ` [PATCH 5/6] netfilter: allow NFQUEUE bypass if no listener is available Florian Westphal
2011-01-18 15:09 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2011-01-16 13:19 ` [PATCH 6/6] netfilter: do not omit re-route check on NF_QUEUE verdict Florian Westphal
2011-01-18 15:14 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-01-18 15:31 ` Florian Westphal
2011-01-19 23:14 ` Florian Westphal
2011-01-20 7:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-01-20 9:24 ` Patrick McHardy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-26 23:58 [PATCH] NFQUEUE v2 target with 'queue bypass' support Florian Westphal
2010-12-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 5/6] netfilter: allow NFQUEUE bypass if no listener is available Florian Westphal
2011-01-12 19:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D35AD29.2060400@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=fwestphal@astaro.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).