From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mr Dash Four Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Relationship between conntrack and firewall rules Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:04:47 +0000 Message-ID: <4D38CD9F.1040905@googlemail.com> References: <1295563629-14996-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Richard Weinberger To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:43305 "EHLO mail-ww0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751997Ab1AUAEz (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:04:55 -0500 Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so56878wwi.1 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:04:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1295563629-14996-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > "conntrack -L" shows us this two entries: > tcp 6 431999 ESTABLISHED src=192.168.1.1 dst=192.168.1.2 sport=51444 \ > dport=22 src=192.168.1.2 dst=192.168.1.1 sport=22 dport=51444 [ASSURED] \ > mark=0 established=1 related=0 new=3 reply=2 use=1 > > icmp 1 28 src=192.168.1.2 dst=149.20.20.133 type=8 code=0 id=63239 \ > src=149.20.20.133 dst=192.168.1.2 type=0 code=0 id=63239 mark=0 \ > established=2 related=0 new=2 reply=1 use=1 > Isn't there supposed to be secctx (SELinux context) field showing as well or is this still not implemented in the conntrack tools?