From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Mr Dash Four <mr.dash.four@googlemail.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Relationship between conntrack and firewall rules
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:56:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D395854.4020100@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D38CD9F.1040905@googlemail.com>
On 21/01/11 01:04, Mr Dash Four wrote:
>
>> "conntrack -L" shows us this two entries:
>> tcp 6 431999 ESTABLISHED src=192.168.1.1 dst=192.168.1.2
>> sport=51444 \
>> dport=22 src=192.168.1.2 dst=192.168.1.1 sport=22 dport=51444
>> [ASSURED] \
>> mark=0 established=1 related=0 new=3 reply=2 use=1
>>
>> icmp 1 28 src=192.168.1.2 dst=149.20.20.133 type=8 code=0 id=63239 \
>> src=149.20.20.133 dst=192.168.1.2 type=0 code=0 id=63239 mark=0 \
>> established=2 related=0 new=2 reply=1 use=1
>>
> Isn't there supposed to be secctx (SELinux context) field showing as
> well or is this still not implemented in the conntrack tools?
http://git.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=libnetfilter_conntrack.git;a=commit;h=fdda1474cc8654430f245b7f01c30e8ff171fa60
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-21 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-20 22:47 [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Relationship between conntrack and firewall rules Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 22:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] netfilter: add ruleid extension Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 22:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] netfilter: add APPROVE target Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 22:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] netfilter: implement ctnetlink_dump_ruleid() Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 22:47 ` [PATCH] iptables: Add APPROVE target Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 22:47 ` [PATCH] conntrack: Implement ruleid support Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 23:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] netfilter: add APPROVE target Jan Engelhardt
2011-01-20 23:22 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 23:27 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-01-20 23:30 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-20 22:52 ` [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Relationship between conntrack and firewall rules Jan Engelhardt
2011-01-20 23:02 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-21 10:00 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-21 11:13 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-21 11:26 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-21 11:56 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-21 12:24 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-21 12:53 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-21 13:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-21 13:38 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-21 13:57 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-21 14:11 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-21 15:09 ` Mr Dash Four
2011-01-21 0:04 ` Mr Dash Four
2011-01-21 0:10 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-01-21 0:13 ` Mr Dash Four
2011-01-21 9:58 ` secctx support for conntrack-tools [was Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Relationship between conntrack and firewall rules] Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-01-21 9:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D395854.4020100@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=mr.dash.four@googlemail.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).